search for: _view_lookup_full

...le "rec" is not available. (gdb) p *seq $1 = 0 (gdb) p *view $2 = {refcount = 2, methods = {close = 0x808df20 <_view_close>, get_messages_count = 0x808d7b0 <_view_get_messages_count>, get_header = 0x808d7c0 <_view_get_header>, lookup_full = 0x808e500 <_view_lookup_full>, lookup_uid = 0x808e480 <_view_lookup_uid>, lookup_uid_range = 0x808e350 <_view_lookup_uid_range>, lookup_first = 0x808e210 <_view_lookup_first>, lookup_ext_full = 0x808d9a0 <_view_lookup_ext_full>, get_header_ext = 0x808e140 <_view_get_header...

...is always zero and trying to get the keywords results in assertion failure, probably because the message is not committed yet: Feb 13 08:07:42 ha-test1 deliver(test1 at example.com): dest mail seq: 23, uid: 0 Feb 13 08:07:42 ha-test1 deliver(test1 at example.com): file mail-index-view.c: line 217 (_view_lookup_full): assertion failed: (seq > 0 && seq <= mail_index_view_get_messages_count(view)) Feb 13 08:07:42 ha-test1 deliver(test1 at example.com): Raw backtrace: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver(i_syslog_panic_handler+0x21) [0x80965d9] -> /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver [0x8096443] -&gt...

http://dovecot.org/test/ Well, remember when I said: > Here you go, maildir syncing problems finally fixed (I hope). Well, > except there's this "new-dir-only syncing" optimization which I'm not > really sure if it works as it should. Just before I found the expunge bug in index, I was trying to fix the new-dir-only syncing because the code looked wrong. Then I

...return mail_cache_compress_locked(cache, view); (gdb) print *view $3 = {refcount = 1, methods = {close = 0x5d078 <_view_close>, get_messages_count = 0x5c30c <_view_get_messages_count>, get_header = 0x5c7e4 <_view_get_header>, lookup_full = 0x5ce00 <_view_lookup_full>, lookup_uid = 0x5cce8 <_view_lookup_uid>, lookup_uid_range = 0x5cb7c <_view_lookup_uid_range>, lookup_first = 0x5c9b4 <_view_lookup_first>, lookup_ext_full = 0x5c630 <_view_lookup_ext_full>, get_header_ext = 0x5d430 <_view_get_header_ext>}, inde...