Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_utc_".
Did you mean:
_etc_
2018 Feb 19
0
vfs_shadow_copy2 with snapprefix & delimiter options in samba 4.6.2
...acl_xattr streams_xattr shadow_copy2
> shadow:snapdir = /data/datashared/.snapshots
> shadow:basedir = /var/datashared
> shadow:sort = desc
> shadow:localtime = yes
> shadow:snapprefix =
> ^\(monthly\)\{0,1\}\(weekly\)\{0,1\}\(daily\)\{0,1\}$
> shadow:delimiter = _UTC_
> shadow:format = _UTC_%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S
> shadow:fixinodes = yes
>
> (I change IPG by UTC in case...)
>
> This does not work better...
> I notice you put btrfs in vfs objects
> I am using xfs + lvm (for snapshots). Do i have to add something
> special in vfs objects...
2018 Feb 16
4
vfs_shadow_copy2 with snapprefix & delimiter options in samba 4.6.2
Hello Dear Samba Users,
I have sucessfully set a samba share on a centos 7 box (samba 4.6.2) and
succeeded into make work snapshots (vfs_shadow_copy2 with xfs and lvm).
The snapshots appears well in windows previous versions.
However, I expected to go further with snapshots and use the options
"shadow:snapprefix" and "shadow:delimiter"in order to filter daily,
weekly
2018 Feb 17
0
vfs_shadow_copy2 with snapprefix & delimiter options in samba 4.6.2
...which does show previous versions:
# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd --version
Version 4.6.11
To avoid having this config block within in each share, I define the
following within the [global] section:
shadow:snapprefix = ^\(monthly\)\{0,1\}\(weekly\)\{0,1\}\(daily\)\{0,1\}$
shadow:delimiter = _UTC_
shadow:format = _UTC_%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S
And then in the config of the shares, I define:
[someshare]
vfs objects = acl_xattr btrfs shadow_copy2
writable = yes
path = /store/samba/someshare
shadow:basedir = /store/samba/someshare
shadow:snapdir = /store/samba/someshare_SNAPS
sha...
2017 Apr 02
2
vfs_shadow_copy2 delimiter not working
Hi
I could not get a custom "shadow:delimiter" for the vfs shadow_copy2
module to work successfully for me with Samba 4.6.2. I did not try
previous versions. Based on my testing it seems that an additional line
of code is needed in vfs_shadow_copy2.c as shown in the patch below
(some comment updates are included too for code readability).
Without the below patch, previous versions