Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_using_sse".
2005 Dec 28
2
Experimental psycho-acoustic model
Hi everyone,
For those who like to play with experimental stuff, I've got something
new to test. If you compile with --enable-vorbis-psy , Speex uses a
variant of the Vorbis psycho-acoustic model to shape the coding noise.
So far, I've obtained a slight increase in quality, but I'm interested
in feedback from others. This still needs a lot of tuning and has
received only a minimal
2005 Dec 31
3
Experimental psycho-acoustic model
> When enabling and compiling this with mingw on Win32, my debugger
> complains about heap overruns when calling speex_encoder_destroy(). This
> could be a mingw issue though, as I also found a stackalignment bug which
> prevents me from _USING_SSE (apparantly -mpreferred-stack-size is just
> "prefered" and therefore ignored... *Sigh*).
Just so I understand, the debugger complains, but the code still runs?
What's the message?
> But, before that point, there seems to be.. well.. I seem to think it's
> better, but...
2005 Dec 31
0
Experimental psycho-acoustic model
...unt of testing, so don't use it for something
> important.
When enabling and compiling this with mingw on Win32, my debugger
complains about heap overruns when calling speex_encoder_destroy(). This
could be a mingw issue though, as I also found a stackalignment bug which
prevents me from _USING_SSE (apparantly -mpreferred-stack-size is just
"prefered" and therefore ignored... *Sigh*).
But, before that point, there seems to be.. well.. I seem to think it's
better, but that could be just because I expect it to be better.
If the heap problem can be fixed, I can ninja-include th...
2005 Dec 31
0
Experimental psycho-acoustic model
>> When enabling and compiling this with mingw on Win32, my debugger
>> complains about heap overruns when calling speex_encoder_destroy(). This
>> could be a mingw issue though, as I also found a stackalignment bug which
>> prevents me from _USING_SSE (apparantly -mpreferred-stack-size is just
>> "prefered" and therefore ignored... *Sigh*).
>
> Just so I understand, the debugger complains, but the code still runs?
> What's the message?
That's right. Ah, I don't have the code here right now, but it was "...