search for: _updated_

...under OS X]: > ..., then download the file R-3.2.0.pkg and install it. This runs on OS X 10.6 and later (Snow Leopard, Lion, Mountain Lion, Mavericks, ...); it is a 64-bit ('x86_64') build which should run on all Macs from mid-2008 on. The above would still hold true for all Macs with _updated_ XCode utilities. --- Obviously GCC, LLVM, and XCode do not represent the extent of the R user base but hopefully the fact that these tools and many others ( linkers, autoconf tools, etc...) have recognized, as you are doing with R-3.1.0 and c++11 support, that times have changed and the people ha...

...owed Fedora''s wiki on building a custom kernel, even used F16''s .config which also was a no-no. I''d like to try F16 which comes with 3.0 out-of-the-box, but I''ve already set up my CentOS 6.2 pretty nicely to just "mkfs.ext3" on it, so if anyone has some _updated_ info (3rd quarter 2011 or 2012) that I can refer to, please advise. Thanks and good night to all. -- David Gonzalez H. Bogota: +(57-1)289-1168 Medellin: +(57-1)247-0985 Cel: +(57)315-838-8326 DGHVoIP - OPEN SOURCE TELEPHONY SOLUTIONS http://www.dghvoip.com/ Proud Linux User #294661 ___________...

...owed Fedora''s wiki on building a custom kernel, even used F16''s .config which also was a no-no. I''d like to try F16 which comes with 3.0 out-of-the-box, but I''ve already set up my CentOS 6.2 pretty nicely to just "mkfs.ext3" on it, so if anyone has some _updated_ info (3rd quarter 2011 or 2012) that I can refer to, please advise. Thanks and good night to all. -- David Gonzalez H. Bogota: +(57-1)289-1168 Medellin: +(57-1)247-0985 Cel: +(57)315-838-8326 DGHVoIP - OPEN SOURCE TELEPHONY SOLUTIONS http://www.dghvoip.com/ Proud Linux User #294661 ___________...

On 07/14/16 05:56, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > @Peter, Erwan, Gene, Michal, (and anyone else interested)... > > Although I haven't actually tested Erwan's patch, would it be > acceptable by you (all) if I were to send a patch to this Syslinux > Mailing List with the same code while changing the wording as I > previously suggested in a prior email? Would it be