search for: _unwind_sword

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "_unwind_sword".

2009 Nov 02
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2 RELEASE_26 bootstrap failure on Solaris/SPARC - unhandled REAL_TYPE during compilation of '__powitf2'
...nton, I went with the first alternative with some success. However, now I get some errors during the build of libgcc with 'multiply defined symbols'. One thing I noticed is the following fact: Definition in unwind-pe.h: static const unsigned char * read_sleb128 (const unsigned char *p, _Unwind_Sword *val) --- GCC 4.2.4 bootstrapped on Solaris/SPARC -bash-3.00$ nm unwind-dw2.o | grep read_sleb128 [9] | 1024| 84|FUNC |LOCL |0 |1 |read_sleb128 --- LLVM-gcc 4.2 on Solaris/SPARC with 64-bit long-double: -bash-3.00$ nm unwind-dw2.o | grep read_sleb128 [613] | 144|...
2009 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2 RELEASE_26 bootstrap failure on Solaris/SPARC - unhandled REAL_TYPE during compilation of '__powitf2'
Hello, Juergen > Ty->dump() prints "{double, double}" in the failing case (just before my > introduced assert). The answer is simple. The code in question contains extended IEEE FP argument / return type (aka 'long double'). By default it's lowered into struct {double, double} as you already saw and sparc currently does not provide any argument layout hooks. There
2009 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2 RELEASE_26 bootstrap failure on Solaris/SPARC - unhandled REAL_TYPE during compilation of '__powitf2'
Hi Anton, thanks for the fast response. Ty->dump() prints "{double, double}" in the failing case (just before my introduced assert). HTH, and regards, Juergen On 10/30/09 16:19, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Juergen > >> With the full patch, I get the assertion of the 'unhandled REAL_TYPE!', >> so I wonder what needs to be done in order to get