search for: _unsafe

Hello, Does the -fstack-protector option work on CLANG 3.1 and 3.2? There is thread on FreeBSD forums about the stack protector and ports and I'm wondering if it's possible to use the -fstack-protector option with CLANG. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36927 -Kimmo

...ime_pm = -1; > module_param_named(runpm, nouveau_runtime_pm, int, 0400); > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(staging_tiling, "enable staging GEM_SET_TILING ioctl"); > +int nouveau_staging_tiling = 0; > +module_param_named(staging_tiling, nouveau_staging_tiling, int, 0600); Please use _unsafe here to make sure that setting this option taints the kernel and gives at least a bit of a deterrent. But in the end the policy is still that you can't regress anything if people complain, which means you might end up with a staging ioctl locked down forever. The other part I don't like wi...

Second version of this patchset addressing Ben's comments and fixing a few extra things. This patchset proposes to introduce a "staging" module option to dynamically enable features (mostly ioctls) that are merged but may be refined before they are declared "stable". The second patch illustrates the use of this staging option with the SET_TILING ioctl, which can be used to