Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_unconditionally_".
Did you mean:
_conditionally_
2020 Jan 14
2
possible bug in win R-devel in check/test environment
Hi,
During my recent r2sundials development, I've came across a strange test
failing during 'R CMD check' exclusively on win R-devel which I could
reproduce with a minimal example that I present here.
The toy packages testarma1 [1] and testarma2 [2] are minimal
modifications of a skeleton package produced by
RcppArmadillo.package.skeleton().
They are almost identical. The first
2020 Jan 14
0
possible bug in win R-devel in check/test environment
...d it to 'Suggests:' field too.
... tests are indeed treated differently and this may just be a different
code path.
If you have something in Suggests: and test for it, you should condition the
test. I have argued that part a few times but mostly to no avail so I too now
mostly give up and _unconditionally_ install Suggests to support tests when I
run bulk tests for reverse dependencies. But it is still wrong.
So here the ball is in your court. Your tests for r2sundials should probably
condition on RcppArmadillo being present and skip tests requiring it if it is
not present. Or, if you don't li...