search for: _u

The following is a revised patch series to add support for a VM generation ID virtual device for HVM guests. The basic requirements of this device are as follows: - It must be exposed somewhere in ACPI namespace with a _CID of "VM_Gen_Counter". - It must also include a _DDN of "VM_Gen_Counter". - It must contain a _HID object but no particular value is required. - It must

Hello, i have a little problem. Our server has an broken RAID. # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sda1[2](F) sdb1[1] 2096064 blocks [2/1] [_U] md2 : active raid1 sda3[2](F) sdb3[1] 1462516672 blocks [2/1] [_U] md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 524224 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: <none> I have remove the partition: # mdadm --remove /dev/md0 /dev/sda1 mdadm: hot removed /dev/sda1 from /dev/md0 # mdadm --rem...

...is called from get_required_bits() (in file cwrs.c:328) the 'K' parameter is 1 which means that the uint32 which is allocated on the stack only has 3 bytes instead of 4. This results in a corrupted stack in the following call to log2_frac().Shouldn't the line cwrs.c:313:ALLOC(u,K+2,celt_uint32_t);Instead say:ALLOC(u,max(K+2,sizeof(celt_uint32_t)),celt_uint32_t);?-- Bjoern _________________________________________________________________ Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&...

...Could either of you expound on the following comment in cwrs.c? /*If _k==0, the following do-while loop will overflow the buffer.*/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- ...because the following do-loop does overflow the buffer when k=126 k=2; do _u[k]=(k<<1)-1; while(++k<len); Thanks, MikeH -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20100701/7cb90de0/attachment-0001.htm

...cally generated mail message from mdadm running on desk4 A DegradedArray event had been detected on md device /dev/md0. Faithfully yours, etc. P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following: Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 dm-2[1] 243682172 blocks super 1.1 [2/1] [_U] bitmap: 2/2 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk md1 : active raid1 dm-3[0] dm-0[1] 1953510268 blocks super 1.1 [2/2] [UU] bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk unused devices: <none> & q Held 314 messages in /var/spool/mail/root You have mail in /var/spool/mail/root Ran a...

...adedArray event had been detected on md device /dev/md125. Faithfully yours, etc. P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following: Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/1] [U_] md126 : active raid1 sdb1[1] 104320 blocks [2/1] [_U] md125 : active raid1 sdb2[1] 312464128 blocks [2/1] [_U] md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] 312464128 blocks [2/1] [U_] unused devices: <none> firstly, what the heck are md125 and md126? previously there was only md0 and md1.... ???? secondly, I'm not s...

...b/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h index fbc961b4..7cfbf308 100644 --- a/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h +++ b/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ struct sigaction { __sighandler_t _sa_handler; void (*_sa_sigaction) (int, struct siginfo *, void *); } _u; - sigset_t sa_mask; - int sa_flags; + unsigned long sa_flags; + sigset_t sa_mask; }; #define sa_handler _u._sa_handler

...b/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h index fbc961b4..7cfbf308 100644 --- a/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h +++ b/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ struct sigaction { __sighandler_t _sa_handler; void (*_sa_sigaction) (int, struct siginfo *, void *); } _u; - sigset_t sa_mask; - int sa_flags; + unsigned long sa_flags; + sigset_t sa_mask; }; #define sa_handler _u._sa_handler

...b/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h index fbc961b4..7cfbf308 100644 --- a/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h +++ b/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ struct sigaction { __sighandler_t _sa_handler; void (*_sa_sigaction) (int, struct siginfo *, void *); } _u; - sigset_t sa_mask; - int sa_flags; + unsigned long sa_flags; + sigset_t sa_mask; }; #define sa_handler _u._sa_handler

...n desk4 > > A DegradedArray event had been detected on md device /dev/md0. > > Faithfully yours, etc. > > P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following: > > Personalities : [raid1] > md0 : active raid1 dm-2[1] > 243682172 blocks super 1.1 [2/1] [_U] > bitmap: 2/2 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk > > md1 : active raid1 dm-3[0] dm-0[1] > 1953510268 blocks super 1.1 [2/2] [UU] > bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk the reason why one drive was kicked out (above [_U] ) will be in /var/log/messages. If it is also pa...

...------ # diff -Nru a/klibc/arch/ia64/include/klibc/archsignal.h b/klibc/arch/ia64/include/klibc/archsignal.h --- a/klibc/arch/ia64/include/klibc/archsignal.h Fri Nov 21 14:30:38 2003 +++ b/klibc/arch/ia64/include/klibc/archsignal.h Fri Nov 21 14:30:38 2003 @@ -28,4 +28,6 @@ #define sa_handler _u._sa_handler #define sa_sigaction _u._sa_sigaction +typedef int sig_atomic_t; + #endif

.../var/log/messages about disk errors or anything. What happened to my sda1??? I had a power outage last week. Any ideas??? Jerry more /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0] 236717696 blocks [2/2] [UU] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] 51199040 blocks [2/1] [_U]

Hi I updated my clone of the LLVM github mirror today and I am finding that the JIT compilation is now 2-3 times slower. The last time I refreshed was maybe 2 weeks ago. Is there a known change that would explain this? This is on Windows 8.1 64-bit. I am using MCJIT. Thanks and Regards Dibyendu

....h b/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h index fbc961b..c52c41a 100644 --- a/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h +++ b/usr/include/arch/ia64/klibc/archsignal.h @@ -22,8 +22,9 @@ struct sigaction { __sighandler_t _sa_handler; void (*_sa_sigaction) (int, struct siginfo *, void *); } _u; - sigset_t sa_mask; int sa_flags; + int __pad0; + sigset_t sa_mask; }; #define sa_handler _u._sa_handler diff --git a/usr/klibc/sigaction.c b/usr/klibc/sigaction.c index 19a8a54..e4901ab 100644 --- a/usr/klibc/sigaction.c +++ b/usr/klibc/sigaction.c @@ -19,13 +19,30 @@ __extern int __rt...

Hi all, I recently updated my to R 2.6.0 and tseries package ?tseries? version: 0.10-11. When i was using R Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01) with tseries 'tseries' version: 0.10-7, the code > garch(dflnRCLC1) ***** ESTIMATION WITH ANALYTICAL GRADIENT ***** Call: garch(x = dflnRCLC1) Coefficient(s): a0 a1 b1 4.985e+00 1.880e-01 6.210e-14 > worked very

Please help me test my setup by dialing 800.564.0215 and listen to the queue for a bit. I have a quad port T1 with NFAS setup. I can dial-out but I cannot dial any 800 numbers (Global Crossing says I need LDS service and that will be a couple weeks) so I cant test it myself. I need at least 24 callers to feel comfortable enough that it is working properly. Thanks, Steve Totaro

Commit 8418552 ("[klibc] ia64: Fix shared build") missed this use of the GP register, although the code appears to have been dubious anyway, assuming the address of errno was the first thing pointed to by GP. --- usr/klibc/arch/ia64/vfork.S | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/usr/klibc/arch/ia64/vfork.S b/usr/klibc/arch/ia64/vfork.S index

...had been detected on md device /dev/md0. > > > > Faithfully yours, etc. > > > > P.S. The /proc/mdstat file currently contains the following: > > > > Personalities : [raid1] > > md0 : active raid1 dm-2[1] > > 243682172 blocks super 1.1 [2/1] [_U] > > bitmap: 2/2 pages [8KB], 65536KB chunk > > > > md1 : active raid1 dm-3[0] dm-0[1] > > 1953510268 blocks super 1.1 [2/2] [UU] > > bitmap: 3/15 pages [12KB], 65536KB chunk > > > the reason why one drive was kicked out (above [_U] ) will &...

...results past an even smaller number of docs (22k) . I''ve tried the two latest ferret releases. Does this listing of the index directory look right? -rw------- 1 blee blee 3.8M Oct 10 17:06 _v.fdt -rw------- 1 blee blee 51K Oct 10 17:06 _v.fdx -rw------- 1 blee blee 12M Oct 10 16:49 _u.cfs -rw------- 1 blee blee 97 Oct 10 16:49 fields -rw------- 1 blee blee 78 Oct 10 16:49 segments -rw------- 1 blee blee 11M Oct 10 16:23 _t.cfs -rw------- 1 blee blee 11M Oct 10 15:56 _s.cfs -rw------- 1 blee blee 15M Oct 10 15:11 _r.cfs -rw------- 1 blee blee 13M Oct 10 14:48 _q.cf...

...ed two file-servers using kickstart. The server has two 1TB sata disks with two software raid1 partitions as follows: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md1 : active raid1 sdb4[1] sda4[0] 933448704 blocks [2/2] [UU] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda2[2](F) 40957568 blocks [2/1] [_U] Now the drives are starting to be failing and next week I'll backup /homes, reinstall OS with kickstart, and finally restore /homes. There's a problem with how the kickstart process partitions the disks, though. As you may have noticed above, md0 is made up of sdb1 and sda2. Could anyb...