search for: _twice_

I just had the unpleasant experience of crashing a production server _twice_ when trying to access a file share. The server is 64-bit Windows 2003 on an itanium3. My box is RedHat Linux 8.0 with Samba 3.0.0-2. Here's some messages from syslog: Mar 19 09:13:58 hedron automount[1037]: attempting to mount entry /dborg/POS Mar 19 09:13:58 hedron mount.smbfs[23153]: [20...

Caveat: I've only played with this a couple of years ago... I believe you can just add each host _twice_ (or as many times as the number of CPUs at that host) to get both CPUs to work. Andy From: Paul Y. Peng > > Hi, > > does anybody know how to use the dual processors in the > machines of a cluster? I am using R with rpvm and snow > packages. I usually start pvm daemon and add...

...ped) Samba config file changes: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_RCVBUF=65536 max xmit = 65536 read size = 65536 getwd cache = Yes locking = Yes The various shares have "use sendfile = yes" Initial testing shows that the Windows 2000 Server stack is almost _twice_ as fast as the Windows 2000 Pro stack. It's unbelievable that Microsoft would cripple their product this way. One of the test runs is available at http://www.mixdown.ca/~andrew/win2ks-win2kp.png. There are three transfers. Ignore the first. The second is an ~1.3GB transfer from Samba...

...ftp 192.168.0.9 # connect to TFTP server, you should get a > new prompt > > > > OK to here using 192.168.1.9 for NIC eth(0) and tftpd server 192.168.1.9 > >I do understand that your network is not 192.168.0.0 but 192.168.1.0. >I don't understand what information is in _twice_ stating 192.168.1.9. /etc/default/tftpd-hpa TFTP_USERNAME = "tftp" TFTP_DIRECTORY = "srv/tftpboot" TFTP_ADDRESS = "192.168.1.9:69" #Same as eth(0) IP address on ethernet card -- is this the right way to do it?******* # ****or should eth(0) IP and TFTP A...

...or the "uid=..." option, but not for "cruid=...". I tested this many times. So I figured that somehow the "cruid=..." use by pam_mount happens too early at a stage where this request returns empty (or something else). To test this, I put the same volume description _TWICE_ into the "/etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml". And voilà: pam_mount works! So as a temporary solution I have a dummy mount in the pam_mount.conf.xml to make sure that the %(USERUID) variable is set correctly when it is needed: <volume fstype="cifs" server="server&quot...

On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 07:46:14AM -0500, John via Syslinux wrote: > At 05:13 AM 9/6/2015, Geert Stappers via Syslinux wrote: > > > >I do understand that your network is not 192.168.0.0 but 192.168.1.0. > >I don't understand what information is in _twice_ stating 192.168.1.9. > > /etc/default/tftpd-hpa > TFTP_USERNAME = "tftp" > TFTP_DIRECTORY = "srv/tftpboot" TFTP_DIRECTORY = "/srv/tftpboot" > TFTP_ADDRESS = "192.168.1.9:69" > #Same as eth(0) IP address on ethernet card -- is t...

...pons on ping > > tftp 192.168.0.9 # connect to TFTP server, you should get a new prompt > > OK to here using 192.168.1.9 for NIC eth(0) and tftpd server 192.168.1.9 I do understand that your network is not 192.168.0.0 but 192.168.1.0. I don't understand what information is in _twice_ stating 192.168.1.9. > New prompt is tftp> Okay the 'tftp>' is from the TFTP client. > > get aa > > This times out That is our problem, in fact a symptoom of the problem. > and returns to tftp> Unable to return to shell using exit command > > &g...

..." option, but not > for "cruid=...". I tested this many times. So I figured that somehow > the "cruid=..." use by pam_mount happens too early at a stage where > this request returns empty (or something else). To test this, I put > the same volume description _TWICE_ into the > "/etc/security/pam_mount.conf.xml". And voilà: pam_mount works! > > So as a temporary solution I have a dummy mount in the > pam_mount.conf.xml to make sure that the %(USERUID) variable is set > correctly when it is needed: > > <volume fstype="ci...

Still having trouble: >> cd /tmp >> ping -c 3 192.168.0.9 # check if TFTP server respons on ping >> tftp 192.168.0.9 # connect to TFTP server, you should get a new prompt OK to here using 192.168.1.9 for NIC eth(0) and tftpd server 192.168.1.9 New prompt is tftp> >> get aa This times out and returns to tftp> Unable to return to shell using exit

Programming Party all day on improving Asterisk, & getting a version running for the BTIP voice conference. Anyone: Please email me or the BTIP list if you know of any recent (past 12 months) Asterisk videos. Thanks. :) Join with the friendly, productive, Global FSW community, in the _TWICE_ monthly, Voice over internet meeting, BerkeleyTIP-Global. GNU(Linux) & BSD, Free SW, HW & FreeCulture, Talks Installfest Project/ProgrammingParty http://sites.google.com/site/berkeleytip/ NEW- _TWO_ monthly day long meetings- 10AM-6PM Pacific (GMT -8H) time, = 1P - 9P Eastern = 6...

I''ve submitted a small patch to make Rails behave properly with the Erubis <%== %> construct. For some reason the current behaviour of that tag in Rails 3 is to escape the contents _twice_ which is probably a bug. I offer three suggestions why this is a good idea: - The syntax is cleaner. It can avoid a lot of .html_safe and raw in your views. I especially like the conciseness of <%=== ''<b>Alert</b>'' if level<0 %> better then the alternative w...

So I have a system running: FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55 EDT 2013 root at walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386 and it has two 2T SATA disks. To keep this post short, the crash.txt is here. https://uk.eicat.ca/owncloud/public.php?service=files&t=fea9d25579fe0c4afb808859e80e1493 now curiously, while running a "make -j4

Am 04.11.2015 um 14:49 schrieb mathias dufresne: > 2015-11-04 13:58 GMT+01:00 Ole Traupe <ole.traupe at tu-berlin.de>: > >> Mathias, thanks again! This sounds like a very reasonable approach. I know >> that with remote ssh and public key authentication you can set the limit to >> a single possible command. is this also possible with AD users? >> > I'm

Hi! Before Rails 2.0 is coming, I suggest not to make CookieStore the default session storage. It stores clear-text values on the client-side and the integrity check hash can be brute-force attacked. I understand that this has been set due to speed advantages, but I believe it''s better to make better security a default. I''ve written a blog post about this