search for: _trying_

...ect. When I did a test of it, I found starting with the Target creation doc [1] and following with the Initiator doc[3] (each on different RH/CentOS boxes) helped me to figure it out. BTW while in [1] they use /dev/vdb it works as well with real /dev/sd* or Logical Volumes, I don't recall _trying_ with PVs. [1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/ch-iscsi.html [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISCSI#Initiator [3] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Storage_Administration_Guide/...

...obviously the others bork). Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong, based on the above? FWIW; this seems to have occurred because I've been attempting to prune my dialplan; I used to have them all going into a single context, and I picked them out & routed them individually. I am _trying_ to simplify the structure/mess that is extensions.conf... but as a result I ran into this little conundrum. The main problem is to resolve the "wrong context"; I have a suspicion I could fix the "can't find extension" problem by getting rid of the letters & using a p...

Without ANY intent of offending anybody, I simply don't like C++. I did code in it for some 12 years back from 1990 to 2002, but then I left it behind with a feeling of happiness. The main reason I am _trying_ to make a new language is that I hope to one day come up with something that can help retiring C++. I love C# but that language is yet too slow for many demanding problem domains. That being said, I don't seriously believe I'll ever finish up my own language, but as long as I am having a...

...ov 26, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Without ANY intent of offending anybody, I simply don't like C++. I did > code in it for some 12 years back from 1990 to 2002, but then I left it > behind with a feeling of happiness. The main reason I am _trying_ to make > a new language is that I hope to one day come up with something that can > help retiring C++. I love C# but that language is yet too slow for many > demanding problem domains. > C++ is far from perfect, but it's pretty amazing (especially with C++11); I'm frequently...

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote: > Thanks for the lecture :) But I was not planning on changing a single > line in LLVM/Clang. I stick to the documentation until I've learned to > swim, perhaps even forever. Ah, now I see. You thought I meant "should I > modify the code to do this or that." I only meant to change

Thanks for the lecture :) But I was not planning on changing a single line in LLVM/Clang. I stick to the documentation until I've learned to swim, perhaps even forever. Ah, now I see. You thought I meant "should I modify the code to do this or that." I only meant to change the documentation. Please refer to the patch I've sent on LLVM-commits. That's about what I had