search for: _try_

Hello, I am wondering which variant is more secure for user authentication and password scheme. Basically I am looking at both variants: 1) MD5-CRYPT password scheme storage with CRAM-MD5 auth mechanism 2) SHA512-CRYPT password scheme storage with PLAIN auth mechanism In my opinion the option 2) should be safer although it is using PLAIN auth mechanism. Of course I would always use STARTTLS and

...e has always been an absolute joy to use (I can't stress this enough!!) while Aegis always struck me as more or less designed to _inhibit_ development! (It really does live up to its name on this point, trust me.) The differences can't _all_ be in my head, I hope! OK, I should at least _try_ to be objective. In contrast to the other VCSs I've used: - Perforce _just works_. By this I mean that it only ever takes effort to make it work _differently_, not to make it work _at all_. I don't want to start a flamewar and so won't mention other VCSs that could be contrasted h...

...always use STARTTLS and not allow unencrypted > connection. Thats not exactly a true statement, if you offer STARTTLS you are optional on encryption, if you mean not allow unencrypted connections then you are forcing TLS, not STARTTLS since the latter is designed to accept unencrypted and then _try_ upgrade to encryption if possible, if not, stay unencrypted. > > What is your opinion? > Number 2 as the other poster said without hesitation and for reasons he said

I am trying to get a programmable database working, and what I see as the only solution is a prog like access via wine. The problem is my computer that I wish to install it on has no floppy drive, and this copy (the first version?) comes with about 10 floppies. -- John R. Sowden AMERICAN SENTRY SYSTEMS, INC. Residential & Commercial Alarm Service UL Listed Central Station Serving the San

ok i've waited a day with steam running and i've stoped and started steam many times and my games still don't show up in the "my games" tab. The same message still appears when i try to repurchase my games saying that the software i want to purchase is not offered in my area. could it be that steam is misreporting my location the the servers? im using ubuntu 8.04 and wine

I've read through some archives on the users mailing list and found some answers to getting Wine 20020122 going. I didn't have to change much with the default way tools/wineinstall. Here's my questions 1) Does Wine run programs that live in a native Windows XP vfat partition using the native dlls? 2) Does Wine run Office XP, even if it is buggy? 3) Can it run programs such as

...allow unencrypted >> connection. > > Thats not exactly a true statement, if you offer STARTTLS you are > optional on encryption, if you mean not allow unencrypted connections > then you are forcing TLS, not STARTTLS since the latter is designed to > accept unencrypted and then _try_ upgrade to encryption if possible, > if not, stay unencrypted. If you add disable_plaintext_auth=yes ssl=required settings, then dovecot will drop authentication without STARTTLS. But damage will be done, client will send unencrypted (or in this scenario MD5 or SHA512 hash) login/password. http...

...00:03.1 (open) [Link:up, TX:0 TXE:0 RX:0 RXE:0] Configuring (net0 52:54:00:12:34:56)...... ok net0: 192.168.88.51/255.255.255.192 gw 192.168.88.4 Next server: 192.168.88.4 Filename: EFI64/syslinux.efi tftp://192.168.88.4/EFI64/syslinux.efi... ok Failed to read blocks: 0xC It does not even _try_ to load ldlinux.e64, because apparently it fails to execute syslinux.efi which should do that. I used several versions of qemu supporting OVMF (which is a tianocore, aka UEFI firmware, "bios"), and the result is the same. I used several different (emulated) network cards in the VM, inc...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3659 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061121/10d6b6f8/smime-0001.bin

..._double_ in size in the next six months. all you other variants are toast. even if you all could manage to form a consensus (yeah, right, like that's gonna happen) where you eliminated your own inconsistencies, you couldn't overcome the lead multimarkdown will soon have. but if you wanna _try_, i would suggest that you use textmate as your workhorse. with the coming alpha of v2.0, which odgaard has promised "by christmas", this "much-anticipated" release of a high-profile app is the _only_ thing that would have a fighting chance against the juggernaut multimarkdown...

...solute joy to use (I can't stress this enough!!) > while Aegis always struck me as more or less designed to _inhibit_ > development! (It really does live up to its name on this point, trust > me.) The differences can't _all_ be in my head, I hope! > > OK, I should at least _try_ to be objective. In contrast to the other > VCSs I've used: > > - Perforce _just works_. By this I mean that it only ever takes > effort to make it work _differently_, not to make it work _at all_. I > don't want to start a flamewar and so won't mention other VCSs...

LLVMers, The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions. If you're interested in this topic (and you should be if you're actively developing), please have a look at this site:

Hi, I'm sure that you are all aware that the mount utilities that ship with samba are designed to compile and run only with Linux 2.1 series development kernels. I'll _try_ keep this short and sweet while doing my best to explain what I have done, since I have a tendancy to ramble on. I have two boxes, one Linux with libc5, and another with Linux and Glibc2 (aka libc6). The Samba package itself compiles and runs fine on the libc5 box (although it was necessary to tu...

Hi Matt, I can see a near future where perf-analysis tooling uses branch history profiler captures to determine how often loops/branches are taken and feeds that into llvm-mca, especially for hot/branchy loop analysis reports etc. Are you confident that your approach will be easily extendable for this? Similarly, being able to generally embed the profile markers in object libraries for