search for: _tkey_is_unacceptable

...; >> Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable >> >> >> >> I already checked what?s listed @ https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable and https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable#Verifying_That_the_BIND_AD_Account_Exists_for_the_DC. >> >> What else? >> >> Thanks, Joachim >> > Start by reading this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKE...

...ror dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. Already tried the step described here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable But when trying to delete the account used the same says that there is (and it really is not listed, create a manual account ok), but when running samba_upgradedns --dns-backend = BIND9_DLZ I got the error Reading domain information Traceback (most recent call last): File "/ opt / samba /...

...gss-tsig. 0 0 3 BADKEY 0 0 dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable ---------------- Then we checked with: ----------- samba_dnsupdate --verbose ----------- Everything is fine, no error about the unacceptable TKEY We did everything from: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable - deleted the dns.keytab - deleted the dns-samba41 user - run "samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ" We checked the permissions of all files. We checked the bind9 config for the TKEY line. Everything is ok. The update works on the second DC without any error about the key. It's...

As the subject says, dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable. I have internet searched for solutions. I have done everything on /wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable/ and I am still getting: At the end of "root at dc01:~# samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names": dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable Failed nsupdate: 1 Failed update of 29 entries root at dc01:~# klist -k -K -t /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab Keytab name: FILE:/var/lib/samba/...

On 01/01/15 14:53, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Rowland, > > Am 01.01.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> OK, anybody know why, if you provision a domain with bind as the >> backend, the dns users name is all lowercase, but if you join another >> DC, the dns users name is partially in uppercase ? >> >> i.e. my first DC has a dns user called dns-dc01, my

This is a common error. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Bart??omiej Solarz-Nies??uchowski via samba > Verzonden: maandag 16 september 2019 14:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > CC: ubi >> Maciej Wysocki [WSISiZ...

...tive (running)'. And I've use 'samba_dnsupdate', as I've mentioned previously, and I've received 'dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable' error and all entries have had their dns update failed. I've read https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable but I think my case doesn't match with described cases. I've thought for a time to demote 'king' from 'SMB' and create a new DC to join 'SMB'. I haven't done it because I've had no guarantees that this will work. OBS: I've used Cent OS7 with firewalld a...

...eptable ---------------- >> >> Then we checked with: ----------- samba_dnsupdate --verbose >> ----------- Everything is fine, no error about the unacceptable >> TKEY >> >> We did everything from: >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable >> >> >> - deleted the dns.keytab >> - deleted the dns-samba41 user - run "samba_upgradedns >> --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ" >> >> We checked the permissions of all files. We checked the bind9 >> config for the TKEY line. Everything is ok. The...

...7 alle 16.00 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba ha > scritto: > > The samba command > > > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > > > not work > > > Following this howto, > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable#Verifying_That_the_BIND_AD_Account_Exists_for_the_DC > > I have try this: > > [ root at server-addc ~]# > LDB_MODULES_PATH=/usr/lib64/samba/ldb/ ldbsearch > -H /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns/sam.ldb 'cn=dns-DC1' dn # Referral > ref: ldap://dogma-to.loc/CN=Conf...

...page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Check_and_fix_DNS_entries_on_DC_joins This described my problem precisely, so I started to follow it, but it didn't fully fix my problem, in fact it changed it to another. So I went to this page : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable and started to follow it, but it all went pear shaped when I deleted the bind dns account and then samba flatly refused to recreate it, saying it still existed, when plainly it didn't ( I later found lower down the page, that this was another known bug, but I totally missed it when I first...

Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 14.48 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > > > The cure is to STOP your windows clients trying to update their own > records. Yes, this is true, on windows I will stop this service. But my problem now is another The samba command samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately not work It's possible to resolve this

Hi everyone, I'm testing with a Samba4 AD network, and I have some problems with DNS on the second DC, with which I could use a bit of your help. I have an AD with two DC's, both Samba 4.2.3. On the first DC, samba_dnsupdate works fine. With stock 4.2.3 I get the error "TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure" but the DNS updates succeed anyway, and after applying

Ah a know error. I suggest, look here, no need to reinstall. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Julien TEHERY via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 22 november 2018 14:45 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba4 multiple DCs replicat...

I just set a DC with samba 4.1 but the other machine that should syncronize the DNS (using bind) just connect and then hang. on /var/log/samba/log.samba I have: [2015/02/11 20:11:53.161439, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:317(samba_runcmd_io_handler) /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: ; TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure I looked around but the fix found did not worked or were not for this

...just looked in my test environment, where I often switch the DNS backend. If you switch from internal to BIND and the dns-hostname account doesn't exist, it will be re-created. So maybe that's the reason, why both are the same here :-) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable#Check_for_existing_DNS-hostname_account In my example, on how to recreate the account, the hostname is generated in upper case there. You can simply try to rename it in AD to upper/lower case and see if DNS updates work (let me know). :-) Regards, Marc

...ORP > dns_lookup_realm = false > dns_lookup_kdc = false > > > Could anyone please give me a hint on where to look further, or which > docs to read to get this working? > > Thanks a lot, > > Roel https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable

...g/index.php/Check_and_fix_DNS_entries_on_DC_joins > > This described my problem precisely, so I started to follow it, but it > didn't fully fix my problem, in fact it changed it to another. > > So I went to this page : > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable > > and started to follow it, but it all went pear shaped when I deleted > the bind dns account and then samba flatly refused to recreate it, > saying it still existed, when plainly it didn't ( I later found lower > down the page, that this was another known bug, but I totally...

...ptable > > when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose > > With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines > that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. > > Already tried the step described here > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable > > > But when trying to delete the account used the same says that there is > (and it really is not listed, create a manual account ok), but when > running > > samba_upgradedns --dns-backend = BIND9_DLZ > > I got the error > > Reading domain information > Tra...

...ptable > > when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose > > With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines > that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. > > Already tried the step described here > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable > > > But when trying to delete the account used the same says that there is > (and it really is not listed, create a manual account ok), but when > running > > samba_upgradedns --dns-backend = BIND9_DLZ > > I got the error > > Reading domain information > Tra...

...: TKEY is unacceptable > ---------------- > > Then we checked with: > ----------- > samba_dnsupdate --verbose > ----------- > Everything is fine, no error about the unacceptable TKEY > > We did everything from: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable > > - deleted the dns.keytab > - deleted the dns-samba41 user > - run "samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ" > > We checked the permissions of all files. We checked the bind9 config > for the TKEY line. Everything is ok. > The update works on the second DC wi...