Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "_test_add_10".
2013 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] Bikeshedding a name for new directive: CHECK-LABEL vs. CHECK-BOUNDARY vs. something else.
...tantFPSDNode *V0CFP =
dyn_cast<ConstantFPSDNode>(V->getOperand(0))) {
The single error message without CHECK-FOO is:
; CHECK: test_add_8
^
<stdin>:125:2: note: scanning from here
.cfi_endproc
^
<stdin>:127:10: note: possible intended match here
.globl _test_add_10
^
The error messages with CHECK-FOO on the function name label lines are:
; CHECK: vmulsd
^
<stdin>:87:2: note: scanning from here
.align 4, 0x90
^
<stdin>:95:2: note: possible intended match here
vsubsd %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0
^
fp-contract.ll:118:15: error: expecte...