Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "_supported".
Did you mean:
supported
2010 May 19
6
dovecot2 latest beta5 acl not working properly ?
Hi
i tested acls with some clients
horde/imp mulberry thunderbird squirrelmail kmail
and i couldnt get it run proberly
i have no problems testing setacl etc with plain
telnet session, and i have no error in verbose logging
but it looks like acl is only working partly with some clients
so show acls is working mostly but setting only partly
horde/imp and mulberry dont show any acls
any idea?
--
2010 Nov 26
4
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 77, Issue 41
...at fixed point numbers must not be optimized as integers - eg if two saturated fixed point constants would overflow in an addition operation, the result should as well be saturated. Doing this in a series of steps with intrinsics would be quite ridiculous as far as performance goes, because this is _supported by the DSP in hardware_ in a single instruction :-)
What about perhaps introducing a new type, and allowing just minor extensions, while barring it from more heavy scattered code? I mean, the GVN pass works by just adding an enum entry and a switch case for each new instruction. But in other case...
2010 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 77, Issue 41
...not be optimized
> as integers - eg if two saturated fixed point constants would overflow in
> an addition operation, the result should as
> well be saturated. Doing this in a series of steps with intrinsics would
> be quite ridiculous as far as performance goes,
> because this is _supported by the DSP in hardware_ in a single instruction
> :-)
Isn't it better to add instructions for saturated and/or fixed point
arithmetic? ... At least that would be consistent with the design of having
separate instructions for signed and unsigned add etc.
- Morten
2014 Jan 19
1
PATCH: add FLAC__SSE_SUPPORTED and FLAC__SSE2_SUPPORTED
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Yes, I think src/libFLAC/include/private/cpu.h would be a better place
> for this SSE version support stuff.
>
> Would you be able to do it or should I?
OK, the attached patch adds FLAC__SSE*_SUPPORTED and also moves their
definitions to cpu.h.
It also adds GCC 4.9 support (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html:
"It is now possible to call x86 intrinsics from select functions in a file
that are tagged with the corresponding target attribute without having
to compile the entire file with th...
2010 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] Fw: LLVMdev Digest, Vol 77, Issue 41
...ized as integers - eg if
> > two saturated fixed point constants would overflow in an addition
> > operation, the result should as well be saturated. Doing this in a
> > series of steps with intrinsics would be quite ridiculous as far as
> > performance goes, because this is _supported by the DSP in hardware_
> > in a single instruction :-)
> >
> > What about perhaps introducing a new type, and allowing just minor
> > extensions, while barring it from more heavy scattered code? I mean,
> > the GVN pass works by just adding an enum entry and a switc...
2010 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 77, Issue 41
...rs must not be optimized as integers - eg if
> two saturated fixed point constants would overflow in an addition
> operation, the result should as well be saturated. Doing this in a
> series of steps with intrinsics would be quite ridiculous as far as
> performance goes, because this is _supported by the DSP in hardware_
> in a single instruction :-)
>
> What about perhaps introducing a new type, and allowing just minor
> extensions, while barring it from more heavy scattered code? I mean,
> the GVN pass works by just adding an enum entry and a switch case for
> each new...
2010 Nov 29
2
[LLVMdev] fixed point types
...gers - eg if
>>> two saturated fixed point constants would overflow in an addition
>>> operation, the result should as well be saturated. Doing this in a
>>> series of steps with intrinsics would be quite ridiculous as far as
>>> performance goes, because this is _supported by the DSP in hardware_
>>> in a single instruction :-)
>>>
>>> What about perhaps introducing a new type, and allowing just minor
>>> extensions, while barring it from more heavy scattered code? I mean,
>>> the GVN pass works by just adding an enum en...
2014 Jan 03
2
PATCH: add FLAC__SSE_SUPPORTED and FLAC__SSE2_SUPPORTED
...sation" = "xyes" ; then
XIPH_ADD_CFLAGS([-msse2])
fi
Also it's not possible to enable SSE4.1 intrinsic functions even
with -msse4.1 option. The patch fixes both problems.
---------------
BTW: I'm not sure that share/compat.h is the best place to define these
FLAC__SSEN_SUPPORTED macros. Maybe it's better to move them to some libFLAC .h file?
E.g. to src/libFLAC/include/private/cpu.h?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sse_support.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 10488 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://list...
2010 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] fixed point types
...t;>> two saturated fixed point constants would overflow in an addition
> >>> operation, the result should as well be saturated. Doing this in a
> >>> series of steps with intrinsics would be quite ridiculous as far as
> >>> performance goes, because this is _supported by the DSP in hardware_
> >>> in a single instruction :-)
> >>>
> >>> What about perhaps introducing a new type, and allowing just minor
> >>> extensions, while barring it from more heavy scattered code? I mean,
> >>> the GVN pass works...