search for: _sse

...t guidelines for assembly optimization, and if you do some > searching, you will find some tips from Jean-Marc on where to start. Also, > if you look in the source tree for references to Blackfin or bfin, you will > find an example port done by Jean-Marc. Yes, have a look at the _bfin.h, _sse.h and _arm.h files to get an idea of what's useful. Also, note that most calls to *_mem2() functions have been (and are being) converted to the _mem16() version. > You should make sure that you run the latest code from Subversion, which has > some speed improvements from 1.1.12. Yes. I&...

...ecause it disables -msse2 switch. Maybe it makes sense to add new switch, --no-force-sse2 or --disable-force-sse2 or similar? And replace if test "x$asm_optimisation$sse_os" = "xyesyes" ; then XIPH_ADD_CFLAGS([-msse2]) fi with if test "x$force_sse2" = "xyes" ; then XIPH_ADD_CFLAGS([-msse2]) fi ?

Hello, I'm trying to use speex for implementing a VoIP demo application using linphone on an embedded system. At the moment I'm not really able to do real time encoding, and thinking about making an assembler port for speex to the AVR32 architecture. The AVR32 is a new hybrid MCU/DSP fixed point processor running at 120Mhz in my application. Does anyone have experiences/info about the

Hi, I can see that there has been some effort to compile the SPEEX codec to operate on the TI c54x and c55x DSPs and I am wondering if anyone would be able to update the mailing list with their current MIPs and Memory resource requirements for their c54x and/or c55x compilation? The only estimate I was able to find in the mailing list archive was 42MIPs but I'm not sure if this is an

...dy). This (very) slightly reduces quality, but means you convert a lot of "emulated" 16x32 multiplications into 16x16. There are also several routines that would benefit from platform-specific optimizations. There are already optimizations for ARM (*_arm4.h), Blackfin (*_bfin.h) and SSE (*_sse.h), so you can see what functions are worth optimizing. For a DSP, there are also two specific things I would watch. First, there is at least one CPU-intensive place (inner_prod) where I have to use many shifts in a loop to prevent overflows, but those could be replaced by a single shift at the e...

The attached patch cleans up Opus's x86 intrinsics configury. It: * Makes ?enable-intrinsics work with clang and other non-GCC compilers * Enables RTCD for the floating-point-mode SSE code in Celt. * Disables use of RTCD in cases where the compiler targets an instruction set by default. * Enables the SSE4.1 Silk optimizations that apply to the common parts of Silk when Opus is built in

...| 4 +- celt/pitch.h | 19 +- celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c | 4 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mathops.c | 11 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mdct.c | 4 +- celt/tests/test_unit_rotation.c | 11 +- celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.c | 4 + celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.h | 12 +- celt/x86/pitch_sse.c | 334 +++++++++++++------------------ celt/x86/pitch_sse.h | 256 ++++++++++------------- celt/x86/pitch_sse2.c | 95 +++++++++ celt/x86/p...

...| 4 +- celt/pitch.h | 19 +- celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c | 4 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mathops.c | 11 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mdct.c | 4 +- celt/tests/test_unit_rotation.c | 11 +- celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.c | 4 + celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.h | 12 +- celt/x86/pitch_sse.c | 334 +++++++++++++------------------ celt/x86/pitch_sse.h | 256 ++++++++++------------- celt/x86/pitch_sse2.c | 95 +++++++++ celt/x86/p...

...ic_modes_float_arm_ne10.h | 404 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c | 55 +++-- celt/tests/test_unit_mathops.c | 21 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mdct.c | 85 ++++--- celt/tests/test_unit_rotation.c | 21 +- celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.c | 4 + celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.h | 12 +- celt/x86/pitch_sse.c | 334 ++++++++++--------------- celt/x86/pitch_sse.h | 256 ++++++++------------ celt/x86/pitch_sse2.c | 95 ++++++++ celt/x86/pitch_sse4_...

...ic_modes_float_arm_ne10.h | 404 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c | 56 +++-- celt/tests/test_unit_mathops.c | 22 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mdct.c | 88 ++++--- celt/tests/test_unit_rotation.c | 22 +- celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.c | 4 + celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.h | 12 +- celt/x86/pitch_sse.c | 334 ++++++++++--------------- celt/x86/pitch_sse.h | 256 ++++++++------------ celt/x86/pitch_sse2.c | 95 ++++++++ celt/x86/pitch_sse4_...

...ic_modes_float_arm_ne10.h | 404 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c | 62 +++-- celt/tests/test_unit_mathops.c | 22 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mdct.c | 88 ++++--- celt/tests/test_unit_rotation.c | 22 +- celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.c | 4 + celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.h | 12 +- celt/x86/pitch_sse.c | 334 ++++++++++--------------- celt/x86/pitch_sse.h | 256 ++++++++------------ celt/x86/pitch_sse2.c | 95 ++++++++ celt/x86/pitch_sse4_...

...ic_modes_float_arm_ne10.h | 404 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c | 62 +++-- celt/tests/test_unit_mathops.c | 22 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mdct.c | 88 ++++--- celt/tests/test_unit_rotation.c | 22 +- celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.c | 4 + celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.h | 12 +- celt/x86/pitch_sse.c | 334 ++++++++++--------------- celt/x86/pitch_sse.h | 256 ++++++++------------ celt/x86/pitch_sse2.c | 95 ++++++++ celt/x86/pitch_sse4_...

...ic_modes_float_arm_ne10.h | 404 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c | 62 +++-- celt/tests/test_unit_mathops.c | 22 +- celt/tests/test_unit_mdct.c | 88 ++++--- celt/tests/test_unit_rotation.c | 22 +- celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.c | 4 + celt/x86/celt_lpc_sse.h | 12 +- celt/x86/pitch_sse.c | 334 ++++++++++--------------- celt/x86/pitch_sse.h | 256 ++++++++------------ celt/x86/pitch_sse2.c | 95 ++++++++ celt/x86/pitch_sse4_...