search for: _ss

...> > is, is there some operation that will let me do this (replace > > SOME_CONCAT with > > an appropriate operator): > > I don't get it, can you try a simpler example on me? :) Ok, let see if I can construct something. >From the IntrinsicsX86.td file: def int_x86_sse_add_ss : GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_ia32_addss">, Intrinsic<[llvm_v4f32_ty, llvm_v4f32_ty, llvm_v4f32_ty], [IntrNoMem, Commutative]>; def int_x86_sse2_add_sd : GCCBuiltin<"__builtin_ia32_addsd">, Intrinsic<...

On Mar 23, 2009, at 5:56 PM, David Greene wrote: > Is it legal to do something like a !strconcat on a non-string > entity? That > is, is there some operation that will let me do this (replace > SOME_CONCAT with > an appropriate operator): I don't get it, can you try a simpler example on me? :) -Chris > > > (WARNING! Hacked-up tablegen ahead!) > >

Is it legal to do something like a !strconcat on a non-string entity? That is, is there some operation that will let me do this (replace SOME_CONCAT with an appropriate operator): (WARNING! Hacked-up tablegen ahead!) multiclass sse_fp_binop_bitwise_rm<bits<8> opc, string OpcodeStr, SDNode OpNode> { // Vector operation emulating scalar (fp)

I noticed that the operand commuting code in X86InstrInfo.cpp treats scalar FMA intrinsics specially. It prevents operand commuting on these scalar instructions because the scalar FMA instructions preserve the upper bits of the vector. Presumably, the restrictions are there because commuting operands potentially changes the result upper bits. However, AFAIK the Intel and GNU FMA intrinsics

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking