search for: _src

Also some missing _src()s and cosmetic changes. --- src/gallium/programs/galliumut/Makefile | 5 + .../programs/galliumut/gen_uureg_opcodes.sh | 29 +++ src/gallium/programs/galliumut/uureg.h | 196 ++++---------------- 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-) create mode...

...nt _dst_ystride, const ogg_int16_t *_residue){ int i; for(i=0;i<8;i++){ @@ -10,7 +15,12 @@ } } -void oc_frag_recon_inter(unsigned char *_dst,int _dst_ystride, +inline void oc_frag_recon_inter(const oc_theora_state *_state,unsigned char *_dst,int _dst_ystride, + const unsigned char *_src,int _src_ystride,const ogg_int16_t *_residue){ +_state->opt_vtable.oc_frag_recon_inter(_dst,_dst_ystride,_src,_src_ystride,_residue); +} + +void oc_frag_recon_inter__c(unsigned char *_dst,int _dst_ystride, const unsigned char *_src,int _src_ystride,const ogg_int16_t *_residue){ int i; fo...

Hello, Is there any exist LLVM Target (backend) that support PC relative load and store? If so, what exactly is the instruction? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191204/c345ac5c/attachment.html>

...nt _dst_ystride, const ogg_int16_t *_residue){ int i; for(i=0;i<8;i++){ @@ -10,7 +15,12 @@ } } -void oc_frag_recon_inter(unsigned char *_dst,int _dst_ystride, +inline void oc_frag_recon_inter(const oc_theora_state *_state,unsigned char *_dst,int _dst_ystride, + const unsigned char *_src,int _src_ystride,const ogg_int16_t *_residue){ +_state->opt_vtable.oc_frag_recon_inter(_dst,_dst_ystride,_src,_src_ystride,_residue); +} + +void oc_frag_recon_inter__c(unsigned char *_dst,int _dst_ystride, const unsigned char *_src,int _src_ystride,const ogg_int16_t *_residue){ int i; fo...

...struct vhost_rpmsg *, struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *); > > + int addr; > > +}; > > + > > +static inline size_t vhost_rpmsg_iter_len(const struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *iter) > > +{ > > + return iter->rhdr.len; > > +} > > + > > +#define VHOST_RPMSG_ITER(_src, _dst) { \ > > + .rhdr = { \ > > + .src = _src, \ > > + .dst = _dst, \ > > + }, \ > > + } > > + > > +void vhost_rpmsg_init(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr, const struct vhost_rpmsg_ept *ept, > > + unsigned int n_epts); > > +void vhost_rpm...

...checking if there is a namespace ... OK * checking for executable files ... OK * checking for hidden files and directories ... NOTE Found the following hidden files and directories: .BBSoptions ._.BBSoptions ._DESCRIPTION ._NAMESPACE ._R ._README ._build ._inst ._man ._src ._vignettes R/._AffyRNAdeg.R R/._Constructors.R R/._TreeSetClasses.R R/._bgcorrect.R R/._dabg.call.R ... man/._AffyRNAdeg.Rd man/._AnalysisTreeSet-class.Rd man/._CallTreeSet-class.Rd man/._DataTreeSet-class.Rd man/._ExprTreeSet-class.Rd ... src/._rwrapper.cxx...

...; +{ > > > > + return iter->rhdr.len; > > > > +} > > > > > > Again, I don't see where this is used. > > > > This is exported API, it's used by users. > > > > > > + > > > > +#define VHOST_RPMSG_ITER(_vq, _src, _dst) { \ > > > > + .rhdr = { \ > > > > + .src = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _src), \ > > > > + .dst = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _dst), \ > > > > + }, \ > > > > + } > > > > > > Same. > > > > ditto. >...

v2: - remove "default n" from Kconfig - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently an RFC - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype Linux supports RPMsg over VirtIO for "remote processor" /AMP use cases. It can however also be used for virtualisation scenarios, e.g. when using KVM to run Linux on both the host and the guests. This

...L: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592456 --- src/http.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/http.c b/src/http.c index dfd8fca..af8d984 100644 --- a/src/http.c +++ b/src/http.c @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ static const char *op_parse_file_url(const char *_src){ # include <winsock2.h> # include <ws2tcpip.h> # include <openssl/ssl.h> +# include <openssl/asn1.h> # include "winerrno.h" typedef SOCKET op_sock; @@ -344,6 +345,7 @@ int SSL_CTX_set_default_verify_paths_win32(SSL_CTX *_ssl_ctx); # include <poll....

...08(%[residue])\n\t" "movq %%mm4,0x10(%[residue])\n\t" "movq %%mm1,0x18(%[residue])\n\t" - "lea 0x20(%[residue]),%[residue]\n\t" + "lea 0x20(%[residue]),%[residue]\n\t" :[residue]"+r"(_residue),[src]"+r"(_src),[ref]"+r"(_ref) :[ystride]"r"((ptrdiff_t)_ystride) :"memory" ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Dios, gracias por tu amor infinito. http://www.primarilypublicdomain.org/letter/ -- Vladimir T?mara Pati?o. http://www.geocities.com/v-tamara -...

...* checking for executable files ... OK > * checking for hidden files and directories ... NOTE > Found the following hidden files and directories: > .BBSoptions > ._.BBSoptions > ._DESCRIPTION > ._NAMESPACE > ._R > ._README > ._build > ._inst > ._man > ._src > ._vignettes > R/._AffyRNAdeg.R > R/._Constructors.R > R/._TreeSetClasses.R > R/._bgcorrect.R > R/._dabg.call.R > ... > man/._AffyRNAdeg.Rd > man/._AnalysisTreeSet-class.Rd > man/._CallTreeSet-class.Rd > man/._DataTreeSet-class.Rd > man/._ExprTreeSet-...

...suggestions for Cortex-M4?</p><p style="margin:0px;"><br></p><p style="margin:0px;">As I knonw, TI TM4C129x is based on Cortex-M4 too:</p><p style="margin:0px;"><a href="http://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-TM4C129POEAUDIO" _src="http://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-TM4C129POEAUDIO">http://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-TM4C129POEAUDIO</a></p><p style="margin:0px;"><a href="http://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-TM4C129POEAUDIO" _src="http://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-TM4C129POEAUDIO"></a&...

...ssize_t (*read)(struct vhost_rpmsg *, struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *); + ssize_t (*write)(struct vhost_rpmsg *, struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *); + int addr; +}; + +static inline size_t vhost_rpmsg_iter_len(const struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *iter) +{ + return iter->rhdr.len; +} + +#define VHOST_RPMSG_ITER(_vq, _src, _dst) { \ + .rhdr = { \ + .src = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _src), \ + .dst = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _dst), \ + }, \ + } + +void vhost_rpmsg_init(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr, const struct vhost_rpmsg_ept *ept, + unsigned int n_epts); +void vhost_rpmsg_destroy(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr); +int...

...{ + ssize_t (*read)(struct vhost_rpmsg *, struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *); + ssize_t (*write)(struct vhost_rpmsg *, struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *); + int addr; +}; + +static inline size_t vhost_rpmsg_iter_len(const struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *iter) +{ + return iter->rhdr.len; +} + +#define VHOST_RPMSG_ITER(_src, _dst) { \ + .rhdr = { \ + .src = _src, \ + .dst = _dst, \ + }, \ + } + +void vhost_rpmsg_init(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr, const struct vhost_rpmsg_ept *ept, + unsigned int n_epts); +void vhost_rpmsg_destroy(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr); +int vhost_rpmsg_ns_announce(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr, c...

...ssize_t (*read)(struct vhost_rpmsg *, struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *); + ssize_t (*write)(struct vhost_rpmsg *, struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *); + int addr; +}; + +static inline size_t vhost_rpmsg_iter_len(const struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *iter) +{ + return iter->rhdr.len; +} + +#define VHOST_RPMSG_ITER(_vq, _src, _dst) { \ + .rhdr = { \ + .src = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _src), \ + .dst = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _dst), \ + }, \ + } + +void vhost_rpmsg_init(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr, const struct vhost_rpmsg_ept *ept, + unsigned int n_epts); +void vhost_rpmsg_destroy(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr); +int...

Hi, Next update: v5: - don't hard-code message layout v4: - add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard v3: - address several checkpatch warnings - address comments from Mathieu Poirier v2: - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently an RFC - address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart:

Hi, Next update: v5: - don't hard-code message layout v4: - add endianness conversions to comply with the VirtIO standard v3: - address several checkpatch warnings - address comments from Mathieu Poirier v2: - update patch #5 with a correct vhost_dev_init() prototype - drop patch #6 - it depends on a different patch, that is currently an RFC - address comments from Pierre-Louis Bossart:

...t; +} > > > > > > > > > > Again, I don't see where this is used. > > > > > > > > This is exported API, it's used by users. > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > +#define VHOST_RPMSG_ITER(_vq, _src, _dst) { \ > > > > > > + .rhdr = { \ > > > > > > + .src = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _src), \ > > > > > > + .dst = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _dst), \ > > > > > > + }, \ > > > > > > + } > > > >...

...+static inline size_t vhost_rpmsg_iter_len(const struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *iter) > > +{ > > + return iter->rhdr.len; > > +} > > Again, I don't see where this is used. This is exported API, it's used by users. > > + > > +#define VHOST_RPMSG_ITER(_vq, _src, _dst) { \ > > + .rhdr = { \ > > + .src = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _src), \ > > + .dst = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _dst), \ > > + }, \ > > + } > > Same. ditto. Thanks Guennadi > Thanks, > Mathieu > > > + > > +void vhost_rpmsg_init(...

...t vhost_rpmsg *, struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *); > > + int addr; > > +}; > > + > > +static inline size_t vhost_rpmsg_iter_len(const struct vhost_rpmsg_iter *iter) > > +{ > > + return iter->rhdr.len; > > +} > > + > > +#define VHOST_RPMSG_ITER(_vq, _src, _dst) { \ > > + .rhdr = { \ > > + .src = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _src), \ > > + .dst = cpu_to_vhost32(_vq, _dst), \ > > + }, \ > > + } > > + > > +void vhost_rpmsg_init(struct vhost_rpmsg *vr, const struct vhost_rpmsg_ept *ept, > > +...