search for: _significant_

...16 14 15 16 18 The command used was ... trend_table<-xtable(trend.table,caption="Caption",display=c('fg','fg','fg','fg'),size='small') trend_table The R help on xtable states that "fg" displays 'digits' as number of _significant_ digits. As a result no decimal places are shown in the last two rows, as expected, but no decimal places are shown neither in the first two rows, if the real value in the cell is greater than 10, and only 1 decimal place if the value in the cell is lower than 10. Thus instead of example II, I got i...

...1.00 12.00 15.00 16.00 [4,] 14.00 15.00 16.00 18.00 > trend_table<-xtable(mymat,caption="Caption",display=c('s','fg','fg','fg','fg'),size='small') The R help on xtable states that "fg" displays 'digits' as number of _significant_ digits. As a result no decimal places are shown in the last two rows, as I wanted, but no decimal places are shown neither in the first two rows, if the real value in the cell is greater than 10, and only 1 decimal place if the value in the cell is lower than 10. Thus I got the following Latex out...

I figure this group will know better than any other I have contact with, is 700-800 I/Ops reasonable for a 7200 RPM SATA drive (1 TB Sun badged Seagate ST31000N in a J4400) ? I have a resilver running and am seeing about 700-800 writes/sec. on the hot spare as it resilvers. There is no other I/O activity on this box, as this is a remote replication target for production data. I have a the

...e value of X rounded to DIGITS decimal digits (after the decimal point). This is the function used by R's `round()'. ^^^^^^^^^^ -- Function: double fround (double X, double DIGITS) Returns the value of X rounded to DIGITS _significant_ decimal digits. This is the function used by R's `signif()'. ^^^^^^^^^^^ I think that is crossed vis-a-vis the the corresponding R functions, ie 'double fprec is used by 'signif (not round) 'double fro...

...d of in the past, which hasn't been the case for quite some time now). this is about moving forward, and ensuring a framework in which progress can be made. i'm fed up with the arbitrary way in which critical open source projects aren't, if you look at it critically, really making any _significant_ progress in _significant_ leaps or bounds to further _real_ business needs and problems, at a time when windows is moving inexorably further up its own behind, and people are just ... lapping it up because they don't BELIEVE they have any CHOICE [or they actually don't: e.g. where is the Op...