Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "_seemed_".
Did you mean:
_seem_
2002 Jun 11
5
DNS Proxy - WINS problem - please help
Here is my scenario when a client wants to resolve a name on my local
network:
CLIENT --> VPN --> SAMBA --> DNS
The client is set up like so:
DNS1 = ISP DNS1 (204.26.64.1)
DNS2 = ISP DNS2 (204.26.80.3)
WINS1 = my samba1 (10.10.1.5)
WINS2 = my samba2 (10.10.1.8)
This all _seemed_ to have worked 3 days ago for roughly 6 months but
stopped suddenly without me doing anything.
When the client requests a name on my local network like atlas
(10.10.1.8), there is no resolution at all.
My first reaction was there was a firewall change or something, but that
is not the case.
1)...
2015 Jan 13
0
PATH directive
...39;s going
on here.
> Then the statement that "the CWD is *always* searched-for first" is
> inaccurate.
>
> The statement (as included in the official documentation) seems to be
> directed to c32 dependencies, but then this is one of the reasons why
> the PATH rules _seemed_ to be relevant for c32 dependencies only. Since
> the PATH rules apply to all c32 files (not just c32 dependencies), then
> the wording for the PATH rules should account for each-and-all cases,
> not just for dependencies.
>
> From users' perspective...
>
> The stateme...
2022 Jul 08
0
[PATCH v2 07/19] mm/migrate: Convert expected_page_refs() to folio_expected_refs()
...maybe you didn't intend any change, but the PG_private test just got
> missed in a few places. I don't know, hope you remember, but current
> linux-next badly inconsistent.
> Over to you, thanks,
Ugh. The problem I'm trying to solve is that we're short on page flags.
We _seemed_ to have correlation between "page->private != NULL" and
"PG_private is set", and so I thought I could make progress towards
removing PG_private. But the rule you set out above wasn't written down
anywhere that I was able to find it.
I'm about to go to sleep, but I...
2022 Jul 08
0
[PATCH v2 07/19] mm/migrate: Convert expected_page_refs() to folio_expected_refs()
...maybe you didn't intend any change, but the PG_private test just got
> missed in a few places. I don't know, hope you remember, but current
> linux-next badly inconsistent.
> Over to you, thanks,
Ugh. The problem I'm trying to solve is that we're short on page flags.
We _seemed_ to have correlation between "page->private != NULL" and
"PG_private is set", and so I thought I could make progress towards
removing PG_private. But the rule you set out above wasn't written down
anywhere that I was able to find it.
I'm about to go to sleep, but I...
2015 Jan 02
2
PATH directive
...working directory is not
> searched.
>
Then the statement that "the CWD is *always* searched-for first" is
inaccurate.
The statement (as included in the official documentation) seems to be
directed to c32 dependencies, but then this is one of the reasons why
the PATH rules _seemed_ to be relevant for c32 dependencies only. Since
the PATH rules apply to all c32 files (not just c32 dependencies), then
the wording for the PATH rules should account for each-and-all cases,
not just for dependencies.
>From users' perspective...
The statement might be accurate for c32 *d...
2015 Jan 13
1
PATH directive
...Then the statement that "the CWD is *always* searched-for first" is
> > inaccurate.
> >
> > The statement (as included in the official documentation) seems to be
> > directed to c32 dependencies, but then this is one of the reasons why
> > the PATH rules _seemed_ to be relevant for c32 dependencies only. Since
> > the PATH rules apply to all c32 files (not just c32 dependencies), then
> > the wording for the PATH rules should account for each-and-all cases,
> > not just for dependencies.
> >
> > From users' perspective....
2008 Oct 10
2
Fatal error: unable to restore saved data in .RData
Hello,
I am unable to start an R session by double-clicking on an existing
.RData file from the Windoze file explorer.
A dialogue appears with the message
"Fatal error: unable to restore saved data in .RData",
and I notice in the R Console the last few lines are:
"Loading required package: R2HTML
NULL
error in function () : unused argument(s) (1:43)"
I tried starting
2015 Jan 01
0
PATH directive
On Sat, 20 Dec, at 12:48:18AM, Ady wrote:
>
> So, my first (still incomplete and still inaccurate) attempt to write
> some rules about the PATH directive, and ask about remaining doubts!...
>
>
> The search (for c32 files) is supposed to respect the following rules:
>
> 1_ The search for c32 files is performed according to the following
> rules. The search for
2014 Dec 19
3
PATH directive
> On Thu, 18 Dec, at 07:47:18PM, Ady wrote:
> > I have a question about the PATH directive. In fact, the question is
> > not about how it is currently working, but about its intention or goal,
> > or how it was supposed to work (or how it was thought about for the
> > 5.00 release).
> >
> > Previous discussions about the PATH directive in the Syslinux