search for: _run_

i get a permission denied error when i try to run civ 4 from a cd, even under wine. i didnt see anything in the faq about this so i thought i would ask here if anyone knows how the get permission.

Hi, is there a platform independent way to log a complete R session (input + output + warnings + errors + ???) into a text file? I can use sink(file, split=T) and savehistory() but it is quite cumbersome to merge the files and still there is some loss (eg. warnings). I wondered that I only found this thread from 2003(!) related to this topic:

...5950e3df69> which added the suffix handling, which I never noticed before. I found the same issue reported at <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666135>. For comparison I just installed a fresh Debian Wheezy rc1 and noticed that the XenStore tdb there is locates in /var/_run_/xenstore/tdb instead of /var/_lib_/xenstore/tdb. Since /var/run/ lives on a tempfs, it's nuked on every reboot and thus the problem doesn't exist there. Is the XenStore tdb supposed to survive a reboot or must it be cleared between each reboot? Sincerely Philipp -- Philipp Hahn...

...5950e3df69> which added the suffix handling, which I never noticed before. I found the same issue reported at <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666135>. For comparison I just installed a fresh Debian Wheezy rc1 and noticed that the XenStore tdb there is locates in /var/_run_/xenstore/tdb instead of /var/_lib_/xenstore/tdb. Since /var/run/ lives on a tempfs, it's nuked on every reboot and thus the problem doesn't exist there. Is the XenStore tdb supposed to survive a reboot or must it be cleared between each reboot? Sincerely Philipp -- Philipp Hahn...

List, I am attempting to install RMySQL on a Kubuntu box. mysql and R were installed using the adept package manager: "apt-get install mysql-server" "apt-get install r-base" I can access mysql via the terminal and I can open R and perform various basic tasks. However, I cannot install the RMySQL package in R. I get the following error: * Installing *source*

On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 15:03 +0000, Antti Kantee wrote: > For unikernels, the rump kernel project provides Rumprun, which can > provide you with a near-full POSIX'y interface. I'm not 100% clear: Does rumprun _build_ or _run_ the application? It sound s like it builds but the name suggests otherwise. > Rumprun also provides > toolchain wrappers so that you can compile existing programs as Rumprun > unikernels. Do these wrappers make a rump kernel build target look just like any other ross build target? (I...

On 08/09/15 16:15, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 15:03 +0000, Antti Kantee wrote: > >> For unikernels, the rump kernel project provides Rumprun, which can >> provide you with a near-full POSIX'y interface. > > I'm not 100% clear: Does rumprun _build_ or _run_ the application? It sound > s like it builds but the name suggests otherwise. For all practical purposes, Rumprun is an OS, except that you always cross-compile for it. So, I'd say "yes", but it depends on how you want to interpret the situation. We could spend days writing em...

Hi, Wei Liu hinted that I should "chime in and / or provide corrections" (his words). I'll attempt to do exactly that by not really replying to anything specific. For the record, when I say "we" in this mail, I mean "people who have contributed to the rump kernel project" (as also indicated by the email-hat). First of all, there's a difference between

...ote: > > On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 15:03 +0000, Antti Kantee wrote: > > > > > For unikernels, the rump kernel project provides Rumprun, which can > > > provide you with a near-full POSIX'y interface. > > > > I'm not 100% clear: Does rumprun _build_ or _run_ the application? It > > sound > > s like it builds but the name suggests otherwise. > > For all practical purposes, Rumprun is an OS, except that you always > cross-compile for it. So, I'd say "yes", but it depends on how you want > to interpret the situati...

If wxRuby-SWIG is as usable as wxRuby 0.6.0, maybe it should be given a version number and packaged up for download. Given the nature of SWIG, having a lot more people use it would probably result in more code contributions to this project. Seems most of the changes are 2+ months old, so I''m guessing wxRuby-SWIG is fairly stable right now in terms of frequency of changes...