search for: _ro

...eShare as root. ? Applied Permissions back onto the /mnt/user/PrivateShare folder using a Windows domain member logged in as TESTLAB\ur_admin via access to the share. ? Update: UR_Admin User - Change Apply To from "This Folder" to "This folder, subfolders and files". ? Add: _RO Group - RO access applied to "This folder, subfolders and files". ? Add: _RW Group - RW access applied to "This folder, subfolders and files". ? Remove the Everyone Permission ? Remove the stale IDs ? Ensure the "Replace all child object permission entries with inhe...

...eg Enlow wrote: ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS proxies that point the client to that read-only share. As a neat bell & whistle we had hoped to be able to let the user know that they were using an obsolete URL (server name) by sending them a message/mail/whack on the head. At t...

On 12/05/15 20:27, Greg Enlow wrote: > To the powers the might be, > > it seems that the "(root) preexec" function does not work when used with "msdfs proxy". Is that just "my" problem, an error or by design? > If it is by design, I would be curious to know why. > If it is an error, can it be addressed fairly quickly? > If it is none of the above,

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:12:12 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 > unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on

...t; Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. > > This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing > read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have > duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share > name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS > proxies that point the client to that read-only share. As a neat bell & > whistle we had hoped to be able to let the user know that they were using an > obsolete URL (server name) by sending them a message/mail/whack on...

ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS proxies that point the client to that read-only share. As a neat bell & whistle we had hoped to be able to let the user know that they were using an obsolete URL (server name) by sending them a message/mail/whack on the head. At t...

...eg Enlow wrote: ok ok ... Names have been changed to protect the inoccent. This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS proxies that point the client to that read-only share. As a neat bell & whistle we had hoped to be able to let the user know that they were using an obsolete URL (server name) by sending them a message/mail/whack on the head. At th...

...> ? Applied Permissions back onto the /mnt/user/PrivateShare > folder using a Windows domain member logged in as TESTLAB\ur_admin > via access to the share. ? Update: UR_Admin User - Change Apply To > from "This Folder" to "This folder, subfolders and files". ? Add: _RO > Group - RO access applied to "This folder, subfolders and files". ? > Add: _RW Group - RW access applied to "This folder, subfolders and > files". ? Remove the Everyone Permission ? Remove the stale IDs ? > Ensure the "Replace all child object permission entri...

...anged to protect the inoccent. >> >> This installation is being used to mitigate a server migration by providing >> read-only access to the new shares under the old server name. We have >> duplicated all the current shares on the new server (NETAPP) as {share >> name}_ro and created equivalent shares on the SAMBA installation as DFS >> proxies that point the client to that read-only share. As a neat bell & >> whistle we had hoped to be able to let the user know that they were using an >> obsolete URL (server name) by sending them a message/ma...

...: 5b 81 22 4e 56 48 4d 00 00 40 80 00 20 52 56 42 [."NVHM.. at .. RVB 01b0: 53 20 00 80 7c 01 52 42 46 31 80 00 40 52 42 46 S ..|.RBF1.. at RBF 01c0: 32 80 00 40 10 43 0a 5c 2f 04 5f 53 42 5f 50 43 2.. at .C.\/._SB_PC 01d0: 49 30 50 45 47 30 50 45 47 50 14 4d 08 5f 52 4f I0PEG0PEGP.M._RO 01e0: 4d 02 70 68 60 70 69 61 a0 0b 94 61 0b 00 10 70 M.ph`pia...a...p 01f0: 0b 00 10 61 a0 0d 94 60 0c 00 00 01 00 a4 11 03 ...a...`........ 0200: 61 00 a0 0c 94 60 52 56 42 53 a4 11 03 61 00 77 a....`RVBS...a.w 0210: 61 0a 08 63 08 52 4f 4d 31 11 05 0b 00 80 00 08 a..c.ROM1....... 0...