search for: _require_

...the list, that it is no good >> idea to mix samba versions in a domain. If there is sound advice to >> do it anyways, I would be up for trying it. However, as I have >> written above, I messed up the uid/gid ranges. To my understanding, >> later versions of Samba (like 4.5) _require_ the ranges to comply to >> the defaults as denoted by the wiki. > There is nothing to stop you using different versions on DCs and you > can do the same with Unix domain members, unless you are using the 'ad' > backend and are NOT using Domain Users as the users Unix primary...

...the list, that it is no good >> idea to mix samba versions in a domain. If there is sound advice to >> do it anyways, I would be up for trying it. However, as I have >> written above, I messed up the uid/gid ranges. To my understanding, >> later versions of Samba (like 4.5) _require_ the ranges to comply to >> the defaults as denoted by the wiki. > There is nothing to stop you using different versions on DCs and you > can do the same with Unix domain members, unless you are using the 'ad' > backend and are NOT using Domain Users as the users Unix primary...

...to remember having read here on the list, that it is no good idea to mix samba versions in a domain. If there is sound advice to do it anyways, I would be up for trying it. However, as I have written above, I messed up the uid/gid ranges. To my understanding, later versions of Samba (like 4.5) _require_ the ranges to comply to the defaults as denoted by the wiki. >> >> What I can think of is: >> - removing the dead DC from the clients DNS config, of course >> - removing it from AD DNS >> - removing it from AD Sites and Services >> - and removing it from AD Us...

I can't seem to find a succinct listing of the packages (and optional packages) required to compile dovecot. I see references to various RDBMS's, but nothing that says I actually _require_ one, etc. I see references to openssl, but similarly, I don't see that it's technically required. Is there a link I'm missing that indicates the pre-conditions (pre-installed/configured software) before compiling and linking dovecot? Thanks in advance! -AJ -------------- next part --...

...user provides valid # credentials. May be used to deny access or customise the view def authenticate @authenticated_user = nil authenticate_with_http_basic do |user, pass| @authenticated_user = User.authenticate(user, pass) end return true end #Filter for actions that _require_ authentication. Unless client authenticated # as some user, takes over the request and sends a response code of 401. def must_authenticate if @authenticated_user && (@user_is_viewing_themselves != false) return true else request_http_basic_authentication return...

...; the UPN. It appears from the Microsoft documentation that the suffixes (multiple allowed) provide a mapping to the UPN, rather than change it, and one of the named security benefits is to hide the actual UPN. In any case, it also appears that many newer MS products, e.g. Azure, Outlook 2016, etc. _require_ the login name to match the e-mail address. Please look at this again before committing to the documentation change, which seems to diverge from the goal of making SAMBA work like a Windows AD DC. Here are some MS documents (contemporaneous with document linked in documentation prior to this chang...

...important is the central auth db. If the IDs on the various DCs and members in the domain do not have the same sets of unix IDs, then nevertheless - local login will work. - ssh login will work. - rsync will work if not using --numeric-ids. - cifs mount will work. What else does one need that would _require_ identical ids? All member servers could even have the same IDs by rfc attributes (or an ldap or rid idmap config). > I know that AD was a microsoft invention, but this doesn't make > it a bad idea :-) and whilst Samba needs to be compatible with > microsoft AD, there is no reason why...

...ing read here on the list, that it is no good > idea to mix samba versions in a domain. If there is sound advice to > do it anyways, I would be up for trying it. However, as I have > written above, I messed up the uid/gid ranges. To my understanding, > later versions of Samba (like 4.5) _require_ the ranges to comply to > the defaults as denoted by the wiki. There is nothing to stop you using different versions on DCs and you can do the same with Unix domain members, unless you are using the 'ad' backend and are NOT using Domain Users as the users Unix primary group. It is howe...

...it is no good >>> idea to mix samba versions in a domain. If there is sound advice to >>> do it anyways, I would be up for trying it. However, as I have >>> written above, I messed up the uid/gid ranges. To my understanding, >>> later versions of Samba (like 4.5) _require_ the ranges to comply to >>> the defaults as denoted by the wiki. >> There is nothing to stop you using different versions on DCs and you >> can do the same with Unix domain members, unless you are using the 'ad' >> backend  and are NOT using Domain Users as the us...

...s no good > >> idea to mix samba versions in a domain. If there is sound advice to > >> do it anyways, I would be up for trying it. However, as I have > >> written above, I messed up the uid/gid ranges. To my understanding, > >> later versions of Samba (like 4.5) _require_ the ranges to comply > >> to the defaults as denoted by the wiki. > > There is nothing to stop you using different versions on DCs and you > > can do the same with Unix domain members, unless you are using the > > 'ad' backend and are NOT using Domain Users as th...

...it is no good >>> idea to mix samba versions in a domain. If there is sound advice to >>> do it anyways, I would be up for trying it. However, as I have >>> written above, I messed up the uid/gid ranges. To my understanding, >>> later versions of Samba (like 4.5) _require_ the ranges to comply to >>> the defaults as denoted by the wiki. >> There is nothing to stop you using different versions on DCs and you >> can do the same with Unix domain members, unless you are using the 'ad' >> backend  and are NOT using Domain Users as the us...

Is there any requirement for TclTk support for R? When I tried to call the tcltk library, it failed with the following message: > library(tcltk) Error in firstlib(which.lib.loc, package) : Tcl/Tk support is not available on this system Error in library(tcltk) : .First.lib failed for 'tcltk' The system information is as follows: Linux osirus.tgen.org 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp #1

...using a PXE boot, although local installation is an option. Long story short, Microsoft has _never_ produced a "consumer" Windows product, not DOS7 "Chicago" nor NT, that is "read-only" bootable. That's been a major limitation of DOS/NT versus UNIX systems, they _require_ the filesystem to be "read/write" during the boot process. Most of this is due to the more "consumer" libraries designed for DOS7 "Chicago" Windows (9x/Me). At the most they've created an ultra-light Win32 kernel with just enough to RDesktop out of a EEPROM. But...

R-crew, I'm trying to install the R-Snapshot which I downloaded a few hours ago and I'm having a problem I can't trace. My system is Sun SPARC, SunOS 5.3 : 1996 >From running ./configure:*************************************** loading cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... /opt/local/R/R-snapshot/etc/install-sh -c checking whether ln -s works... yes

...t;>>> idea to mix samba versions in a domain. If there is sound advice to >>>> do it anyways, I would be up for trying it. However, as I have >>>> written above, I messed up the uid/gid ranges. To my understanding, >>>> later versions of Samba (like 4.5) _require_ the ranges to comply to >>>> the defaults as denoted by the wiki. >>> There is nothing to stop you using different versions on DCs and you >>> can do the same with Unix domain members, unless you are using the 'ad' >>> backend  and are NOT using Domain...

Dear R-list, I'd like to do a meta-analysis plot similar to install.packages('rmeta') require(rmeta) data(catheter) a <- meta.MH(n.trt, n.ctrl, col.trt, col.ctrl, data=catheter, names=Name, subset=c(13,6,5,3,7,12,4,11,1,8,10,2)) summary(a) plot(a) (see attached file) by using my own OR (Odds Ratio) and 95% Confidence Interval data set, which looks like

Hi all, I''ve been going over the chapters on RDOC and gems lately. I think we should probably work on making the code in Win32Utils "rdoc" friendly. I''ve started doing this with ''win32-ipc'' as an experiment. This probably means some directory reorganization, because I think gems looks for extensions in an ''ext'' directory, whereas

On 05.06.2018 20:39, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 6/5/2018 2:11 PM, Ole Traupe via samba wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I have a domain in production on two sites (subnets, via "Sites and >> Services") with originally two DCs. One went down due to HDD (-> old >> hardware) error. Now, occasionally, clients cant access/find the file >> server (domain

On 07/11/15 21:29, Michael Adam wrote: > On 2015-11-07 at 18:54 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 07/11/15 18:23, Michael Adam wrote: >>> On 2015-11-07 at 18:00 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 07/11/15 17:47, Jonathan Hunter wrote: >>>>> On 7 November 2015 at 17:01, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org> wrote: >>>>>> Also, for

Hi folks, Does anyone know how to tackle Swedish letters in Rails. Am I completely off track in thinking that it should be done using map or regex in some clever way? Bealach