search for: _reason_

Jim Grosbach wrote: > No. The above rule is absolutely the wrong thing to do, as has been > previously noted. I don't give a shit about whether you think it is "absolutely wrong" or not; I did what hpa and the Intel manual outlined. If you have some _reason_ not to do that, bring it up. I reported four bugs a few days ago, and the community has shown ZERO (if not NEGATIVE) interest in fixing them. I got Linus and hpa to comment on the issue, and help the community figure out what needs to be done. I posted not one, but MULTIPLE patches demonstrating...

...m Grosbach wrote: > > No. The above rule is absolutely the wrong thing to do, as has been > > previously noted. > > I don't give a shit about whether you think it is "absolutely wrong" > or not; I did what hpa and the Intel manual outlined. If you have > some _reason_ not to do that, bring it up. In case you have missed this, this is not LKML. Please keep your abusive language at home. Linus and hpa are no almighty authorities here and this is not the Linux kernel community. Joerg

...gt; No. The above rule is absolutely the wrong thing to do, as has been > > > previously noted. > > > > I don't give a shit about whether you think it is "absolutely wrong" > > or not; I did what hpa and the Intel manual outlined. If you have > > some _reason_ not to do that, bring it up. > > In case you have missed this, this is not LKML. Please keep your abusive > language at home. Linus and hpa are no almighty authorities here and > this is not the Linux kernel community. > Linus is an expert on the x86 instruction set, so his advice o...

I have two patches enclosed below. One for 'ogg' and the other for 'vorbis'. Basically, I was trying to do a 'make dist' and then 'rpm -ta <filename>' to try and generate some nice RPMs for vorbis stuff. Basically in the ogg .spec file, I move the 'libogg.a' and 'libogg.so' stuff into the devel package (all other packages I've seen do