search for: _really_

I have disabled NetBIOS over TCP/IP on our network, both for Windows and for Samba hosts. Samba hosts have these directives in their smb.conf disable netbios = yes smb ports = 445 But I still see NetBIOS broadcasts and responses coming from Samba hosts, probably because they are still running nmbd. Can I just shut nmbd down or does it still have use? Thanks, Pim

Beryl has a --skip-gl-yield ( I think now managed by --force-nvidia, dont really know though), that eases the use of beryl under heavy CPU load. Is this implemented in compiz? Cause compiz is _REALLY_ slow under heavy cpu use for me. Thanks, Joel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/attachments/20070419/55ba4ed7/attachment.html

Wow! Ogg is sounding _really_ fine these days. Waaaay past my ability to tell from CD on my crappy sound card, even at pretty low bitrates. Which leads to my question: there's a huge difference between what my sound card puts out and what my CD player can do (Rotel RCD-950 to Classe' Audio Twenty preamp to Acurus A80...

...ior configurations later in the week. >- -Tom Hi Tom, I''m using Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8-10 and Shorewall 2.0.10-2 which are both standard packages with Sarge. Do you have any new information regarding RoadWarrior configurations? Patching the kernel is something that I would _really_ like to avoid if possible. Thanks, Mitch

...827141 is relevant … we've seen similiar symptoms, recompiling samba and friends with the patch mentioned there restored the behaviour we got with pre-badlock 4.1.17. it boils down to winbind not re-using signed&sealed connections when pulling user information from the ad, which seems to be _really_ expensive. hth, t. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20160718/9132b968/signature.sig>

...omething like DUNDi, which we have no experience with and we don't know if these single-tenant packages even handle DUNDi setup thru their web management interface. Any opinions/comments/recommendations? Before anyone recommends just buying the virtual PBX service from someone else, we _really_ want to do this in-house :) Thanks

...to > > 2 weeks: 1209600 and we''ll see if any further restarts are needed > by > > monit. > >I''ve always wondered why 14400 is the number that is always passed >around when talking about extending the timeout period. Maybe there >is some db issue with a _really_ long timeout like 1209600? This has been discussed a few times on list I think. I believe the issue here is that you need the client end of the connection to timeout AFTER the server end of the connection. Setting this to arbitrarily large numbers will not do anything (afaik) b/c the server wil...

...ought to be "obeyed unless impossible". In particular, the LLVM backend is designed to be usable in routine production, which means that certain kinds of very expensive performance optimization will be unfeasible to be integrated. So I'd like at least a way to say "this is what I _really_ want the vectorizer to assume" in such metadata. Regards, Dave -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any...

...e" down to a one-second interval. Sometimes, a small program can make me very happy, and I suppose after a morning full of various system problems I'm overly happy have something that works and does just what I want it to. This is useful for checking to see how much bandwidth a codec _really_ uses, or seeing what your total usage is between two IAX hosts, or pretty much anything that requires live examination of ethernet segment traffic. http://s-tech.linux-pl.com/bmtools/ [root@ms1 bmtools-0.71]# ./rate -r 1 -f 'host 10.0.1.3 and not port ssh' -> Currently 263.05 Bps/3....

Has anyone got hints on using KVM switches with XFree86? I'm using a wheel mouse and moused, but something gets out of whack when I switch away then back to X. Next time I touch the mouse, all sorts of weird things happen for a fraction of a second, then the mouse starts working OK. This is annoying and dangerous because it often winds up pasting random stuff into xterms..... Are there

...isk. So I thought of these things: - Problem with linux distribution ? Nope, got 2 different distributions and happens on both ? - Bug with mpg123 ? Nope, used native Asterisk moh thing, still happens. - Memory leak due to a loop in my configuration ? Nope, 3 diffrent configurations, 2 of them are _really_ simple (like 3 context and some dial strings :P). Since I'm no programmer and not really a bug-hunter I'm out of idea's right now. The only solution for me nog is to reboot the machines if and when it happens. I was unable to find a similar problem in the mailinglist and nobody had th...

...ator class. Each derivative > allocator is responsible for overriding it and calling it if it deems > necessary. I'm actually fairly nervous about using inheritance this way. I know it's done like this all over LLVM but the Template Method pattern is often better. You don't _really_ need dynamic polymorphism for things like this. Static polymorphism is sufficient and it has the advantage of more flexibility for reuse (doesn't depend on a specific base class). For example, if I'm writing a register allocator, one way to do what you're saying without inheritance is...

Are there existing rpms for courier mta? I am working from: http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-fedora-14-x86_64 And am making progress with postfix and mysql, but looking ahead to other steps. I see squirrelmail is in EPEL.

...d doesn't do search and replace Not on my NT4.0 system: I can do search/replace. It's true that NotePad is not so bad for someone who starts with R, and I used it during some time (and still does). But I recently discovered ESS with XEmacs on a Solaris machine, and I must admit that it is _really_ different. After all, it would be good for a beginner to have the features of ESS (syntax highlitning, buffer execution, automatic indentation, ...) rather than waiting to be experienced with R. (I seem to remember that the R-FAQ recommends ESS.) Emmanuel Paradis -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-....

Am I just blind, or are there no links to the instructions, e.g. the Search syntax or how to get back to a thread I started on RoR? Or do those links, buttons, whatever only show / work in IE? Thanks for any help; sorry if I can''t figure out something I should be able to. jandjharris (at) gmail.com -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

> The extra branches that Anton added to clang.git didn't rewrite anything. > Here's hoping it won't be necessary for llvm.git either. I was hoping that the rebuilt won't change the sha's and noone will notice anything (well, except those who already branched out of branches / tags). But it seems that after rebuild stuff was changed (I really dunno, why). So, we'll go

...was hoping that the rebuilt won't change the sha's and noone will > notice anything (well, except those who already branched out of > branches / tags). > But it seems that after rebuild stuff was changed (I really dunno, > why). So, we'll go other way. Just to be clear: we _really_ do not want all the sha's to change for trunk. > > In any case, it's unwise now to use published branches / tags :) > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hi, I noticed that in line 288-289 of lib/CodeGen/GCStrategy.cpp there is a loop: > for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) { > for (BasicBlock::iterator II = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); > II != E;) { E is used both for F.end() and for BB->end(). Is this intended? -Y. -- Yiannis Tsiouris Ph.D.

...h for F.end() and for BB->end(). Is this intended? Note that it's also being declared in the for header, so the inner E is shadowing the outer E (ie, they're separate variables). So it's not wrong per se, although I always compile with -Wshadow because problems when this happens are _really_ nasty to track down. Cheers, Dave

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > One other specific problem with this is that (I'm told) MSVC 2010 > doesn't support range-based for loops. I don't think it is reasonable > to require windows users to be on MSVC 2012. That's _really_ unfortunate. I've found range-based for gets one thinking a different way about how to present data. The range concept tends to propagate and lots of potential bug sites get cleaned up. It can be done incrementally with no problem, but the exercise of converting a class to provide a range in...