search for: _query_all_fmt

During last update packets pidgin and libpurple were updated while "yum update"-ing Is it a common and normal thing that both x86_64 and i386 arch rpms are installed during update? This not the first time. -- Cheers, Alexx mailto:alexx187 at gmail.com

...ics the upstream behavior in RHEL. > > What you need to do after install if you want x86_64 only is this: > > 1. Modify .rpmmacros for root user and any user you want to see the > arch of packages with this value (in a .rpmmacros in the user's home > directory): > > %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch} > > 2. Do this query (after you adjust .rpmmacros per step one) to see any > 32 bit packages installed: > > rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86 | sort > > 3. If you are sure you want to remove all the 32 packages, you would do: > > yum...

...---- example: [root at x86-64 ~]# rpm -qa | grep popt popt-1.9.1-21 popt-1.9.1-21 ---------------------------- To fix this problem on multi-lib machines (and change the default query format), you can change your .rpmmacros (or create a .rpmmacros) in your user home directory and add this line: %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch} --------------------------- Now the result of the above example is: [root at x86-64 ~]# rpm -qa | grep popt popt-1.9.1-21.x86_64 popt-1.9.1-21.i386 --------------------------- So now you can easily tell which arch of a program is installed on multi-lib...

I updated my i386 systems without any problems, but when I tried to update one of my x86_64 systems, I got an error from yum. Transaction Check Error: file /usr/include/libdevmapper.h from install of device-mapper-1.02.02-3.0.RHEL4 conflicts with file from package device-mapper-1.01.04-1.0.RHEL4 So it can't install the newer package because it conflicts with the older package???

Hello! Need to install the required rpmz to support 32bit apps on 64bit Centos 4. How to find out which rpmz are needed? TIA Tony

Hi A search of google failed to show any prebuilt rpms for sshfs and fuse. I do see that fuse support is in 2.6.14 kernel which isn't a whole lot of help. Before I dive headlong into this has anyone successfully built fuse/sshfs against Centos 4.4. If so would you share your experience? Thanks Daveh

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Centos, Is 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 really dependent on the 32 bit perl.i386 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 as yum is suggesting, or has something got mixed up on the system? yum install perl Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: repo.bigstepcloud.com * epel: mirror.bytemark.co.uk * extras:

Hello, I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc. I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it. That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ? The other thing I noticed is

...res for all packages. This behavior mimics the upstream behavior in RHEL. What you need to do after install if you want x86_64 only is this: 1. Modify .rpmmacros for root user and any user you want to see the arch of packages with this value (in a .rpmmacros in the user's home directory): %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch} 2. Do this query (after you adjust .rpmmacros per step one) to see any 32 bit packages installed: rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86 | sort 3. If you are sure you want to remove all the 32 packages, you would do: yum remove $(rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86) 4. Then ed...

I'm trying to run "yum update" on "CentOS release 3.4 (final)": But I'm getting an error: <snip> Package mod_ssl needs httpd = 2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2, this is not available. </snip> However: </snip> [root at dev1 root]# rpm -qa | grep httpd httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2 httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2 </snip> It's installed. So I

Hi All: On architectures where multiple architectures for an RPM may be simultaneously installed (my example is x86_64), does anyone know the RPM magic to remove only one version? For instance, if I have the x86_64 and i386 versions of an RPM installed, how I can specify to only remove the i386 version? I have been unable to find a search phrase that turns up any useful information.

Hi All, I have a freshly installed CentOS 5.3, x86_64 system -- just the Base package selection (via custom packages selection), and nothing else. Immediately after install (no updates), here's what's in the RPM db: [root at dev ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i glib2 glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6 glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6 [root at dev ~]# I have two questions about this: (1) Should this package be

I am trying to install the R package "Rmpi" which needs libmpi. I've installed openmpi and lam in Centos 5.2: [root at rab45-1 /]# rpm -qv openmpi openmpi-1.2.5-5.el5 openmpi-1.2.5-5.el5 [root at rab45-1 /]# rpm -qv lam lam-7.1.2-14.el5 lam-7.1.2-14.el5 But I get the following error message when trying to install Rmpi: /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/lam/lib/libmpi.so

Hi all, has somebody already tried to compile the rpm of the newest samba package on a 64-bit CentOS. I tried to do it with the Fedora spec file and it quit with an error, that some files are not located in the lib64 directory. These required files are located in the lib directory. Any sugesstion how this problem could be fixed in a clean way? How is this problem solved during the CentOS

...RHEL. >> >> What you need to do after install if you want x86_64 only is this: >> >> 1. Modify .rpmmacros for root user and any user you want to see the >> arch of packages with this value (in a .rpmmacros in the user's home >> directory): >> >> %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch} >> >> 2. Do this query (after you adjust .rpmmacros per step one) to see any >> 32 bit packages installed: >> >> rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86 | sort >> >> 3. If you are sure you want to remove all the 32 packages, you...

Hi, I'm trying to run Norman anti-virus on a CentOS 3 box, x64. Is it possible? Running the binary gives me this error: [root at server bin]# ./nvcc -bash: ./nvcc: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory I guess I would have to install i386 libraries that it requires, as well. It it possible? Regards, Ugo

OK so at some point I borked my mysql 4.1.20 installation on my x86_64 system. Possibly relevant: I have enabled the centosplus repository in yum.conf because I needed a package from there. I have not upgraded mysql from there. Everything was working, then "something" aparrently happened, and now mysql won't start. The logs say: 061031 11:37:38 mysqld started 061031 11:37:38

Hey All, I'm trying to upgrade to perl 5.8.8 via CentOSPlus, but am having no luck. Here is what I have done. # yum list | grep perl . . . perl.i386 3:5.8.5-12.1 installed . . . Created /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo with: #additional packages that extend functionality of existing packages [centosplus] name=CentOS-$releasever - Plus

I have an Athlon/64, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB IDE system and I'm intending to use it for combination workstation/Dev server duties. I've gotten a consistent failure when I try to groupinstall KDE. After grinding through all the deps, it comes up with the below: Install 228 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 331 M Is this ok [y/N]: y

I have an Athlon/64, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB IDE system and I'm intending to use it for combination workstation/Dev server duties. I've gotten a consistent failure when I try to groupinstall KDE. After grinding through all the deps, it comes up with the below: Install 228 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 331 M Is this ok [y/N]: y