Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "_query_all_fmt".
2007 Jul 02
3
Both archs version rpm are installed during update?
During last update packets pidgin and libpurple were updated while "yum
update"-ing
Is it a common and normal thing that both x86_64 and i386 arch rpms are
installed during update? This not the first time.
--
Cheers,
Alexx mailto:alexx187 at gmail.com
2014 Nov 24
2
Yum installed perl on CentOS 5.11 64 bit
...ics the upstream behavior in RHEL.
>
> What you need to do after install if you want x86_64 only is this:
>
> 1. Modify .rpmmacros for root user and any user you want to see the
> arch of packages with this value (in a .rpmmacros in the user's home
> directory):
>
> %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
>
> 2. Do this query (after you adjust .rpmmacros per step one) to see any
> 32 bit packages installed:
>
> rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86 | sort
>
> 3. If you are sure you want to remove all the 32 packages, you would do:
>
> yum...
2005 Jan 12
2
Change your default rpm query format on multi-lib archs (like x86_64)
...----
example:
[root at x86-64 ~]# rpm -qa | grep popt
popt-1.9.1-21
popt-1.9.1-21
----------------------------
To fix this problem on multi-lib machines (and change the default query
format), you can change your .rpmmacros (or create a .rpmmacros) in your
user home directory and add this line:
%_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
---------------------------
Now the result of the above example is:
[root at x86-64 ~]# rpm -qa | grep popt
popt-1.9.1-21.x86_64
popt-1.9.1-21.i386
---------------------------
So now you can easily tell which arch of a program is installed on
multi-lib...
2006 Apr 11
2
yum update conflict
I updated my i386 systems without any problems, but when I tried to
update one of my x86_64 systems, I got an error from yum.
Transaction Check Error: file /usr/include/libdevmapper.h from
install of device-mapper-1.02.02-3.0.RHEL4 conflicts with file from
package device-mapper-1.01.04-1.0.RHEL4
So it can't install the newer package because it conflicts with the
older package???
2007 Jul 25
2
rpms for 32 bit
Hello!
Need to install the required rpmz to support 32bit apps on 64bit Centos 4.
How to find out which rpmz are needed?
TIA
Tony
2006 Sep 14
3
Anyone using fuse and/or sshfs under Centos 4.4?
Hi
A search of google failed to show any prebuilt rpms for sshfs and fuse.
I do see that fuse support is in 2.6.14 kernel which isn't a whole lot of
help.
Before I dive headlong into this has anyone successfully built fuse/sshfs
against Centos 4.4.
If so would you share your experience?
Thanks
Daveh
2014 Nov 23
4
Yum installed perl on CentOS 5.11 64 bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Centos,
Is 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 really dependent on the 32 bit perl.i386
4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 as yum is suggesting, or has something got mixed up on
the system?
yum install perl
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: repo.bigstepcloud.com
* epel: mirror.bytemark.co.uk
* extras:
2005 Oct 27
4
Minimal server install and a few other questions.....
Hello,
I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed
with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN
in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc.
I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it.
That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ?
The other thing I noticed is
2014 Nov 24
0
Yum installed perl on CentOS 5.11 64 bit
...res for all packages.
This behavior mimics the upstream behavior in RHEL.
What you need to do after install if you want x86_64 only is this:
1. Modify .rpmmacros for root user and any user you want to see the
arch of packages with this value (in a .rpmmacros in the user's home
directory):
%_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
2. Do this query (after you adjust .rpmmacros per step one) to see any
32 bit packages installed:
rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86 | sort
3. If you are sure you want to remove all the 32 packages, you would do:
yum remove $(rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86)
4. Then ed...
2006 Jan 10
1
Yum out of sync?
I'm trying to run "yum update" on "CentOS release 3.4 (final)":
But I'm getting an error:
<snip>
Package mod_ssl needs httpd = 2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2, this is not
available.
</snip>
However:
</snip>
[root at dev1 root]# rpm -qa | grep httpd
httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2
httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2
</snip>
It's installed.
So I
2005 Jul 01
2
RPM -e for single architecture
Hi All:
On architectures where multiple architectures for an RPM may be simultaneously
installed (my example is x86_64), does anyone know the RPM magic to remove
only one version?
For instance, if I have the x86_64 and i386 versions of an RPM installed, how
I can specify to only remove the i386 version?
I have been unable to find a search phrase that turns up any useful
information.
2009 May 18
1
CentOS 5.3: duplicate glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6 packages
Hi All,
I have a freshly installed CentOS 5.3, x86_64 system -- just the Base
package selection (via custom packages selection), and nothing else.
Immediately after install (no updates), here's what's in the RPM db:
[root at dev ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i glib2
glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6
glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6
[root at dev ~]#
I have two questions about this:
(1) Should this package be
2009 Mar 27
2
Installing openmpi & lam for use with R
I am trying to install the R package "Rmpi" which needs libmpi. I've
installed openmpi and lam in Centos 5.2:
[root at rab45-1 /]# rpm -qv openmpi
openmpi-1.2.5-5.el5
openmpi-1.2.5-5.el5
[root at rab45-1 /]# rpm -qv lam
lam-7.1.2-14.el5
lam-7.1.2-14.el5
But I get the following error message when trying to install Rmpi:
/usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/lam/lib/libmpi.so
2006 Jan 11
1
Selfmade ... Samba 3.0.20a on CentOS 4.0 x64
Hi all,
has somebody already tried to compile the rpm of the newest samba
package on a 64-bit CentOS. I tried to do it with the Fedora spec file
and it quit with an error, that some files are not located in the lib64
directory. These required files are located in the lib directory. Any
sugesstion how this problem could be fixed in a clean way? How
is this problem solved during the CentOS
2014 Nov 24
0
Yum installed perl on CentOS 5.11 64 bit
...RHEL.
>>
>> What you need to do after install if you want x86_64 only is this:
>>
>> 1. Modify .rpmmacros for root user and any user you want to see the
>> arch of packages with this value (in a .rpmmacros in the user's home
>> directory):
>>
>> %_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
>>
>> 2. Do this query (after you adjust .rpmmacros per step one) to see any
>> 32 bit packages installed:
>>
>> rpm -qa | grep i[3,6]86 | sort
>>
>> 3. If you are sure you want to remove all the 32 packages, you...
2006 Nov 09
4
Running a 32-bit application on CentOS3-x64
Hi,
I'm trying to run Norman anti-virus on a CentOS 3 box, x64. Is it
possible?
Running the binary gives me this error:
[root at server bin]# ./nvcc
-bash: ./nvcc: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or
directory
I guess I would have to install i386 libraries that it requires, as well.
It it possible?
Regards,
Ugo
2006 Oct 31
1
mysql won't start
OK so at some point I borked my mysql 4.1.20 installation on my
x86_64 system. Possibly relevant: I have enabled the centosplus
repository in yum.conf because I needed a package from there. I have
not upgraded mysql from there.
Everything was working, then "something" aparrently happened, and now
mysql won't start. The logs say:
061031 11:37:38 mysqld started
061031 11:37:38
2007 Sep 06
1
CentOSPlus Perl Upgrade
Hey All,
I'm trying to upgrade to perl 5.8.8 via CentOSPlus, but am having no
luck. Here is what I have done.
# yum list | grep perl
. . .
perl.i386 3:5.8.5-12.1 installed
. . .
Created /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo with:
#additional packages that extend functionality of existing packages
[centosplus]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Plus
2006 Apr 17
3
X86_64, Groupinstall KDE fails
I have an Athlon/64, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB IDE system and I'm intending to use it
for combination workstation/Dev server duties.
I've gotten a consistent failure when I try to groupinstall KDE. After
grinding through all the deps, it comes up with the below:
Install 228 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 331 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
2006 Apr 17
3
X86_64, Groupinstall KDE fails
I have an Athlon/64, 1 GB RAM, 80 GB IDE system and I'm intending to use it
for combination workstation/Dev server duties.
I've gotten a consistent failure when I try to groupinstall KDE. After
grinding through all the deps, it comes up with the below:
Install 228 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 331 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y