search for: _pure_

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "_pure_".

2017 Dec 12
3
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...not to do so. Of course you do have the upside is that it can improve compile time. Which is certainly of value, and perhaps that's a worthwhile trade-off when the implementation and forward-declare are both within a single project and thus easy to coordinate. But, it's not by any means a _pure_ win. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171212/80176fa2/attachment.html>
2017 Dec 13
2
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...Of course you do have the upside is that it can improve compile time. > Which is certainly of value, and perhaps that's a worthwhile trade-off when > the implementation and forward-declare are both within a single project and > thus easy to coordinate. But, it's not by any means a _pure_ win. > > That's correct. I was speaking about the LLVM codebase though (I should've > stated that clearer), and in LLVM I don't remember many occasions of > refactorings you mentioned. For LLVM forward declaration is recommended by > the style guide: > http://llvm.org/...
2007 Mar 19
2
.NET Application under wine
Hello! I want to install a .NET application under wine - if I try to install it .NET Setup tells me to install IE > 5. Can anybody help me please?
2017 Oct 03
0
nofrills: Low-Cost Anonymous Functions
...ides `fn()`, a compact variation of the usual syntax of function declaration, in order to support tidyverse-style quasiquotation of a function?s arguments and body. Aside from enabling a shorter but fully general syntax for function declarations, the main benefit of `fn()` is its ability to create _pure_ functions via quasiquotation, which is tricky to guarantee in base R, due to the mutability of bindings in a function?s lexical scope. To learn more, see the landing page of the source repository: https://github.com/egnha/nofrills Bug reports and other feedback are welcome at the issues page on G...
2017 Dec 10
3
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
Hi Michael, On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Michael Zolotukhin <mzolotukhin at apple.com> wrote: > > Nice to IWYU developers here:) I wonder how hard it would be to run IWYU on > LLVM/Clang (or, if it’s supposed to work, I wonder what I did wrong). There are known problems with running IWYU over LLVM/Clang -- Zachary Turner made an attempt a while back to get it up and running.