Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "_pure_".
2017 Dec 12
3
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...not to do so.
Of course you do have the upside is that it can improve compile time. Which
is certainly of value, and perhaps that's a worthwhile trade-off when the
implementation and forward-declare are both within a single project and
thus easy to coordinate. But, it's not by any means a _pure_ win.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171212/80176fa2/attachment.html>
2017 Dec 13
2
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
...Of course you do have the upside is that it can improve compile time.
> Which is certainly of value, and perhaps that's a worthwhile trade-off when
> the implementation and forward-declare are both within a single project and
> thus easy to coordinate. But, it's not by any means a _pure_ win.
>
> That's correct. I was speaking about the LLVM codebase though (I should've
> stated that clearer), and in LLVM I don't remember many occasions of
> refactorings you mentioned. For LLVM forward declaration is recommended by
> the style guide:
> http://llvm.org/...
2007 Mar 19
2
.NET Application under wine
Hello!
I want to install a .NET application under wine - if I try to install it
.NET Setup tells me to install IE > 5.
Can anybody help me please?
2017 Oct 03
0
nofrills: Low-Cost Anonymous Functions
...ides `fn()`, a compact variation of the
usual syntax of function declaration, in order to support
tidyverse-style quasiquotation of a function?s arguments and body.
Aside from enabling a shorter but fully general syntax for function
declarations, the main benefit of `fn()` is its ability to create
_pure_ functions via quasiquotation, which is tricky to guarantee in
base R, due to the mutability of bindings in a function?s lexical scope.
To learn more, see the landing page of the source repository:
https://github.com/egnha/nofrills
Bug reports and other feedback are welcome at the issues page on G...
2017 Dec 10
3
[cfe-dev] Who wants faster LLVM/Clang builds?
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Michael Zolotukhin
<mzolotukhin at apple.com> wrote:
>
> Nice to IWYU developers here:) I wonder how hard it would be to run IWYU on
> LLVM/Clang (or, if it’s supposed to work, I wonder what I did wrong).
There are known problems with running IWYU over LLVM/Clang -- Zachary
Turner made an attempt a while back to get it up and running.