search for: _public

...compressed mail and private indexes for the shared folder. I'm importing mail via formail/dovecot-lda: formail -s /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d admin -m Public/TestSubFolder? < /tmp/Inbox.mbox dovecot -n and the GDB backtrace are attached. # find /var/mail/ -maxdepth 2 /var/mail/_public /var/mail/_public/dovecot.mailbox.log /var/mail/_public/dovecot-uidvalidity /var/mail/_public/dovecot-uidvalidity.53ecade1 /var/mail/_public/storage /var/mail/_public/subscriptions /var/mail/_public/mailboxes /var/mail/admin /var/mail/admin/dovecot-uidvalidity.53ecade2 /var/mail/admin/dovecot.mailb...

...nded too complex. I will write it a bit softer now. The replication through dsnyc works perfectly with one exception. I am having an issue with the replication of the subscriptions file on shared folder. We have a public mailbox defined: namespace public-test { location = maildir:/opt/mail/_public/test prefix = public/test/ separator = / subscriptions = no type = public } There 2 subfolder .Test1 and .Test2 which I would like to subscribe on my user "ldaptestuser" which is part of the group "ldaptestgroup" The dovecot-acl file on /opt/mail/_public/test and...

...Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:58:29PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: > >>> > ... > >> Hum, so the only thing this config does is short circuit here: > >> > >> static inline bool is_device_public_page(const struct page *page) > >> { > >> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS) && > >> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVICE_PUBLIC) && > >> is_zone_device_page(page) && > >> page-&g...

...public folder (public/test/test1 and >> public/test/test2). >> >> My user (ldaptestuser) is an ldap user and this user is member of the >> ldap group (ldaptestgroup) which does have all dovecot-acl rights on >> these folders. >> >> imap-1 # cat /opt/mail/_public/publictest/.test*/dovecot-acl >> group=ldaptestgroup akxeilprwts >> group=ldaptestgroup akxeilprwts >> >> I am now connecting with my mail client to imap-1 (throught haproxy) and >> the subscription to this folder works. The file which is written looks >> like:...

...ser/groups) in dovecot ACLs. 1. I would like to subscribe 2 public folder (public/test/test1 and public/test/test2). My user (ldaptestuser) is an ldap user and this user is member of the ldap group (ldaptestgroup) which does have all dovecot-acl rights on these folders. imap-1 # cat /opt/mail/_public/publictest/.test*/dovecot-acl group=ldaptestgroup akxeilprwts group=ldaptestgroup akxeilprwts I am now connecting with my mail client to imap-1 (throught haproxy) and the subscription to this folder works. The file which is written looks like: imap-1 # cat /opt/mail/ldaptestuser/Mails/subscripti...

Using partials is a nice way to separate chunks of content into separate pages as opposed to building strings in helpers, but I''m wondering which is faster. It scares me when I see stuff like: Rendered users/_public (0.00051) Rendered users/_public (0.00009) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) Rendered users/_public (0.00008) ....50 more times Has anyone done some benchmarking? I''d like to use partials if I could, but not if they''re slower. Thanks, PJ

...t I don't see any users of it > >>> so... should we get rid of it in the code rather than turning the config off? > >>> > >>> Ira > >> > >> That seems reasonable. I recall that the hope was for those IBM Power 9 > >> systems to use _PUBLIC, as they have hardware-based coherent device (GPU) > >> memory, and so the memory really is visible to the CPU. And the IBM team > >> was thinking of taking advantage of it. But I haven't seen anything on > >> that front for a while. > > > > Does anyone k...

...conceptually it seems ok. But I don't see any users of it >>> so... should we get rid of it in the code rather than turning the config off? >>> >>> Ira >> >> That seems reasonable. I recall that the hope was for those IBM Power 9 >> systems to use _PUBLIC, as they have hardware-based coherent device (GPU) >> memory, and so the memory really is visible to the CPU. And the IBM team >> was thinking of taking advantage of it. But I haven't seen anything on >> that front for a while. > > Does anyone know who those people are...

...> > And then - with RequireSecuritySignature=1 - the client cannot access > this share anymore. Just changing to RequireSecuritySignature=0 the > share is working. > > The client says: error 1240 > > The Server sees only "connection reset" > > All I need is a _public share together with smb signing_ and > RequireSecuritySignature=1 > WHY??? Rowland -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

...1. I would like to subscribe 2 public folder (public/test/test1 and > public/test/test2). > > My user (ldaptestuser) is an ldap user and this user is member of the > ldap group (ldaptestgroup) which does have all dovecot-acl rights on > these folders. > > imap-1 # cat /opt/mail/_public/publictest/.test*/dovecot-acl > group=ldaptestgroup akxeilprwts > group=ldaptestgroup akxeilprwts > > I am now connecting with my mail client to imap-1 (throught haproxy) and > the subscription to this folder works. The file which is written looks > like: > > imap-1 # cat /o...

Hi Rowland In former time there was "security=share", now i have to use "RequireSecuritySignature=1" on client side. Documentation for SMB signing says, this is only possible with "security=user", not with share. So I switched to security=user, configured guest-access to the public share and activated this RequireSecuritySignature=1 And then - with

...t/test1 and >>> public/test/test2). >>> >>> My user (ldaptestuser) is an ldap user and this user is member of the >>> ldap group (ldaptestgroup) which does have all dovecot-acl rights on >>> these folders. >>> >>> imap-1 # cat /opt/mail/_public/publictest/.test*/dovecot-acl >>> group=ldaptestgroup akxeilprwts >>> group=ldaptestgroup akxeilprwts >>> >>> I am now connecting with my mail client to imap-1 (throught haproxy) and >>> the subscription to this folder works. The file which is written lo...

...ySignature=1 - the client cannot > > access this share anymore. Just changing to > > RequireSecuritySignature=0 the share is working. > > > > The client says: error 1240 > > > > The Server sees only "connection reset" > > > > All I need is a _public share together with smb signing_ and > > RequireSecuritySignature=1 > > > > WHY??? > > Rowland > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > So you need to make...

...ile changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig > > > > index 0d2ba7e1f43e..406fa45e9ecc 100644 > > > > +++ b/mm/Kconfig > > > > @@ -721,6 +721,7 @@ config DEVICE_PRIVATE > > > > config DEVICE_PUBLIC > > > > bool "Addressable device memory (like GPU memory)" > > > > depends on ARCH_HAS_HMM > > > > + depends on BROKEN > > > > select HMM > > > > select DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS > > > > > > This seems a bit...

...PM, Ira Weiny wrote: > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:58:29PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:53:02PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote: >>> ... >> Hum, so the only thing this config does is short circuit here: >> >> static inline bool is_device_public_page(const struct page *page) >> { >> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS) && >> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEVICE_PUBLIC) && >> is_zone_device_page(page) && >> page->pgmap->type == MEMOR...

...ireSecuritySignature=1 ? the client cannot access > > this share anymore. Just changing to RequireSecuritySignature=0 the > > share is working. > > > > The client says: error 1240 > > > > The Server sees only ?connection reset? > > > > All I need is a _public share together with smb signing_ and > > RequireSecuritySignature=1 > > > > WHY??? > > Rowland > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > So you need to make...

...ot > > > access this share anymore. Just changing to > > > RequireSecuritySignature=0 the share is working. > > > > > > The client says: error 1240 > > > > > > The Server sees only ?connection reset? > > > > > > All I need is a _public share together with smb signing_ and > > > RequireSecuritySignature=1 > > > > > > > WHY??? > > > > Rowland > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.sa...

...t; > access this share anymore. Just changing to > > > RequireSecuritySignature=0 the share is working. > > > > > > The client says: error 1240 > > > > > > The Server sees only "connection reset" > > > > > > All I need is a _public share together with smb signing_ and > > > RequireSecuritySignature=1 > > > > > > > WHY??? > > > > Rowland > > So you need to make sure that the request to connect comes from a > member of your domain ? > > I take it that the members of said...