search for: _possibly_

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "_possibly_".

Did you mean: _possible_
2013 May 08
1
[PATCH] opusfile configury fixes.
...status: 1 So I made configure.ac of opusfile to look a little bit more like that of opus as seen in the first two hunks of the patch inlined below. The last hunk touching the AC_CHECK_HEADER use is needed for me, otherwise the generated configure is broken (using autoconf-2.63, newer versions are _possibly_ OK with the existing syntax). Patch is below. --- configure.ac~ +++ configure.ac @@ -2,16 +2,15 @@ AC_INIT([opusfile], m4_esyscmd([doc/git-version.sh])) +m4_ifdef([AM_SILENT_RULES], [AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])]) + +AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) + AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS AC_SYS_LARGEFILE AM_INIT_A...
2006 Dec 13
4
Effect.Opacity on Firefox Mac Dims text
Hey everyone, I have a series of thumbnails that have a loading overlay placed over them when they''re clicked on. The overlay is set to an opacity of .7.. .The onclick code looks basically does this: var loading = document.createElement(''div''); loading.id = ''loading_image''; $(loading).addClassName(''thumb_loading'');
2007 Aug 09
9
Is DTrace Vulnerable?
There is a Slashdot discussion today titled "Cambridge Researcher Breaks OpenBSD Systrace". Slashdot anonymous member has a comment "Even Sun''s Dtrace might be vulnerable." I don''t think it is. Comments? Exploiting Concurrency Vulnerabilities in System Call Wrappers http://www.watson.org/~robert/2007woot/2007usenixwoot-exploitingconcurrency.pdf Abstract
2012 Sep 26
0
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Parallelization metadata and intrinsics in LLVM (for OpenMP, etc.)
...to lower the intrinsics into something more interesting, perhaps libgomp or maybe even a custom runtime. The proposal ------------ I propose introducing four new intrinsics to llvm: 1. void @llvm.parallel_map(i32 limit, void (i32, i8 *) fn, i8* priv) Semantics: Executes `limit` copies of fn, _possibly_ in parallel. The map index (i32, ranging from 0 to (limit - 1) both inclusive) and `priv` are passed to each of the invocations. The only invariant is that the 0th iteration is always executed in the invoking thread. It is legal to have calls to parallel_map inside a function being parallel_map&...
2012 Aug 14
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Parallelization metadata and intrinsics in LLVM (for OpenMP, etc.)
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:22:35 +0300 Pekka Jääskeläinen <pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi> wrote: > On 08/13/2012 10:54 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > I had thought about uses for shared-memory OpenCL implementations, > > but I don't know enough about the use cases to make a specific > > proposal. Is your metadata documented anywhere? > > It is now a quick "brute
2012 Sep 26
1
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Parallelization metadata and intrinsics in LLVM (for OpenMP, etc.)
...to lower the intrinsics into something more interesting, perhaps libgomp or maybe even a custom runtime. The proposal ------------ I propose introducing four new intrinsics to llvm: 1. void @llvm.parallel_map(i32 limit, void (i32, i8 *) fn, i8* priv) Semantics: Executes `limit` copies of fn, _possibly_ in parallel. The map index (i32, ranging from 0 to (limit - 1) both inclusive) and `priv` are passed to each of the invocations. The only invariant is that the 0th iteration is always executed in the invoking thread. It is legal to have calls to parallel_map inside a function being parallel_map&...
2007 Jan 09
0
FOSDEM Request For Proposal
...n (as long as you wish) - - optional: some HTTP links (related links, project website, blog, ...) * SPEAKER(S) (obviously, for each speaker): - - the full name of the speaker(s) - - if possible and if the speakers don't mind, also send us their email address (it will _not_ be disclosed and only _possibly_ used by us, e.g. to ask for the slides or such) - - an abstract for the speaker (e.g. "Homer Simpson is the lead developer on the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant project and contributes to a few other FOSS projects such as Futurama and Southpark") - - a somewhat longer bio of the speaker...
2011 Feb 16
5
ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden <vaden at texoma.net> wrote: > > N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is > using a release candidate! Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM: ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes difficult to vet. Further, no mirrors have been spotted, which is not to say there