search for: _perhaps_

Hello, we have wrote a own C32 module, loaded with "DEFAULT mod.c32" But sometime the module mod.32 are not loaded & started. How we can debug this ? Or give some debug output. In the main of the module there is a printf, but the text are not shown at booting. Thanks Johann

...uld at least get to the Syslinux "boot" prompt. At that point, press [ENTER] in order to execute the default label. Probably the result won't change from your previous test, but at least you will be able to discard the potential problem in the DEFAULT directive. Other than that, _perhaps_ the following might help someone with the relevant skills (although, please note that the whole page is rather outdated and possibly not very much relevant for UEFI, but YMMV): syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Development/Debugging#Syslinux_Dynamic_Debug ger Regards, Ady.

...f the syslinux.cfg file? No suggestion about kernel options such as 'mem=', 'vmalloc=' or any other / similar? No question about the building environment (nasm, gnu-efi, gcc, binutils, mtools...)? No chance that someone could suggest that updating the gnu-efi submodule _might_ _perhaps_ affect the result? I cannot believe that there is not even one developer that could think (and post here) about the potential idea that some code in EFISTUB (or whatever is related to EFI in the Linux kernel) needs to be also incorporated in Syslinux. Really? There is not one person that could...

Hi, df -h output: root at ubuntu:/home/ubuntu/Downloads/asterisk-11.2.1# df -h S.ficheros Tam. Usado Disp. % Uso Montado en /cow 14G 4,5G 8,7G 34% / udev 999M 4,0K 999M 1% /dev tmpfs 403M 860K 402M 1% /run /dev/sdb1 799M 693M 106M 87% /cdrom /dev/loop0 668M 668M 0 100% /rofs

...(I _always knew that there was _something_ special at the start of every partition, but I never knew what it was called until now.) >For example, if the first partition starting offset is 63 sectors, >the partition table should have CHS values that correspond to LBA 63. I _think_ that I _perhaps_ understand what you just said. >Also the FAT VBR should indicate the "hidden sectors" (aka. "sectors >before") with a corresponding 63. If the values don't match, strange >things will eventually happen. OK. Are you saying that this critical matchup was NOT pres...

Hello, I'm booting linux-3.16-686-pae kernel (32-bit) via syslinux.efi 64-bit version. After boot linux sees only 2.5G of RAM while system has 32G installed. If I boot the same kernel with GRUB64 efi instead of syslinux then amount of RAM available to linux is 32G. Is this a bug or I'm missing something? syslinux.cfg: label live-686-pae menu label Linux (686-pae) menu

> > > > I don't like the idea of changing "UI" (e.g. command line options that > > might be used by some users) without very well-thought reasoning. > > This is not an UI. AFAIK, this script is not shipped to the user. I > don't even see what a user could do with it. > > Well, the Perl script _is_ shipped in the official release, and the

...hat _I_ consider a potential interaction. I am well aware that developers might have a different point of view, and therefore I express this concern of mine _now_. For instance, if someone would had expressed similar concerns when the binaries where moved to the "bios/" sub-directory, _perhaps_ the negative comments and strong complaints (and many, many problems) such move caused (and still causes) _might_ had been re-evaluated. Maybe the resulting decision would had been the same, or maybe not, or maybe the move would had been much better communicated, or maybe package maintainers w...

> With respect to all of the actually important stuff however, I may have > missed it all, but I don't recall having read or seen an explanation of > what Ady & everybody else finally figured out about all this. What is > the answer, in the end? I did get the part about how (for my board, > at least) tweeking some of the info within the relevant MBR partition > table