search for: _particular_

Of interest to some on the list. Anyone familiar enough with Java to know how we go about detecting/using/incorporating an external Jorbis build into the Cortado jar ? Or are we supposed to download sources into our tree and build the whole ? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:31:31 +0100 Subject: Merging jorbis

Libvirt Version: 0.9.8 Hi: I added a new api for qemu_driver. and both added libvirt.c and remote. I tested it and it worked well. the function of this new api was add a new field in xml config of domain. (I added it like qemudDomainSetMemoryFlags)at the same time, I added a new member to struct virDomainDef. then I tested xml config converted to virDomaindef and virDomainDef converted to xml

...lature on the page to reflect this, but while it spins, it does not actually lock. The idea (as I understand it, and I'm still hoping Scott can find the reference he gave me to a DEC paper outlining this) is that the spin only occurs if another process does something breaking atomicity for that _particular_ LL/SC pairing. Even when the spin occurs, it should only occur until that particular process gets through the op without interruption. This needs some statistical analysis however, and hopefully the research in the literature can be located and referenced. > > > > You probably don'...

On Monday 09 July 2007 19:33, Scott Michel wrote: > Torvald Riegel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to see support for something like this. I have some comments, > > and I think there is existing work that you can reuse. > > "reuse within the compiler." within the LLVM compiler framework, to be precise. > > > "While the processor may

Torvald Riegel wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to see support for something like this. I have some comments, and I > think there is existing work that you can reuse. "reuse within the compiler." > "While the processor may spin and attempt the atomic operation more than once > before it is successful, research indicates this is extremely uncommon." > I

dear samba users and developers, i'd like to put to you a proposal for your respectful consideration: it is an idea that i believe has strategic merit for the open source community and OS users as a whole. these words are chosen carefully and the reasons will become apparent later: that i begin as an example. as you are no doubt aware, there have been some seriously damaging (but not