search for: _our

On 02/08/2020 16:26, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On the side note: it is Microsoft that signs one of Linux packages now. We seem to have made one more step away from ?our? computers being _our computers_. Am I wrong? > > Valeri > Microsoft are the Certificate Authority for SecureBoot and most SB-enabled hardware (most x86 hardware) comes with a copy of the Microsoft key preinstalled allowing binaries that are signed by Microsoft to work. In the case of linux, that is the s...

On 8/2/20 2:47 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > > Il 02/08/20 00:42, Mike McCarthy, W1NR ha scritto: > > It appears that it is affecting multiple distributions including Debian > > and Ubuntu so it looks like the grub2 team messed up. See > > > > https://www.zdnet.com/article/boothole-fixes-causing-boot-problems-across-multiple-linux-distros/ > > > > >

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:45 AM Phil Perry <pperry at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 02/08/2020 16:26, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > > On the side note: it is Microsoft that signs one of Linux packages now. > We seem to have made one more step away from ?our? computers being _our > computers_. Am I wrong? > > > > Valeri > > > > Microsoft are the Certificate Authority for SecureBoot and most > SB-enabled hardware (most x86 hardware) comes with a copy of the > Microsoft key preinstalled allowing binaries that are signed by > Microsoft to wo...

*Our Product offerings: *We sell DIDs all over US in 2600+ rate center. For the list of all the available ratecenters please visit us at http://www.didforsale.com/moreinfo.php?help=ratecenter. We have inbound DIDs in 2 different configurations. 1) DID with unmetered inbound and 20 channels ($8.99 per DID per month + $5 Activation per DID) Additional channels can be purchased at $1 per

> On the side note: it is Microsoft that signs one of Linux packages > now. We seem to have made one more step away from ?our? computers > being _our computers_. Am I wrong? > Secure booting using UEFI requires that the code is signed - that is the "secure" bit. Microsoft are the CA for that signing. There's nothing sinister about it, they aren't signing the RPM package just one of the bits of code in the package. I seem...

...2, 2020 at 11:45 AM Phil Perry <pperry at elrepo.org> wrote: > >> On 02/08/2020 16:26, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> On the side note: it is Microsoft that signs one of Linux packages now. >> We seem to have made one more step away from ?our? computers being _our >> computers_. Am I wrong? >>> >>> Valeri >>> >> >> Microsoft are the Certificate Authority for SecureBoot and most >> SB-enabled hardware (most x86 hardware) comes with a copy of the >> Microsoft key preinstalled allowing binaries that are s...

Is anyone out there? Too...whatever to consider an answer?Markusklerer at sxmail.de schrieb (05.02.2016 01:17):Dear list,[a] now is apparently the time, the R version I have installed so far has reached its days' end.[a1] Back on R help mailing list-I have to admit openly-I was advised so under the impression of being unnerved on the part of the corresponding R expert responder to a certain

...t a notch in the reputation level. Hopefully, it is not new lower level now, which hopefully again will be confirmed over long trouble-free period in a future. On the side note: it is Microsoft that signs one of Linux packages now. We seem to have made one more step away from ?our? computers being _our computers_. Am I wrong? Valeri > We have 3 people who build updates as fast as we can and this sofware is > free and unvalidated. We don't do any security testing .. we build and > release RHEL source code. RHEL is what you want if you want software > assurance or the fastest re...