Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "_order8".
Did you mean:
_order
2014 Jul 02
2
[PATCH] two patches of doubtful usefulness
...[i] * (1 << *shift);
is less efficient than for
error += lp_coeff[i] * (1 << pshift);
Cons:
* the speed increase is probably negligible
2)
There's the following code in stream_decoder.c:
if(order <= 8)
decoder->private_->local_lpc_restore_signal_16bit_order8( ... );
else
decoder->private_->local_lpc_restore_signal_16bit( ... );
but local_lpc_restore_signal_16bit is equal to ..._order8 for all
architectures except powerpc/altivec.
The patch hides local_lpc_restore_signal_16bit_order8 under
#ifdef FLAC__CPU_PPC / #endif directives....