search for: _old

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 37 matches for "_old".

Did you mean: __old
2013 Nov 01
3
Merging blzr as blazer (and un-merging voltronic?)
...till available if there are regressions). This is how we are incorporating Michal's apcsmart updates. On your recommendation, I merged voltronic into master for the upcoming 2.7.x release. But if blzr supersedes both voltronic and blazer, I propose we rename blazer_{ser,usb} to blazer_{ser,usb}_old, then rename blzr* to blazer*, and revert the voltronic merge. Does that sound reasonable? (I'm not sure how different the configurations would be for these various drivers.) -- Charles Lepple clepple at gmail
2006 Apr 20
11
dynamic mock object anyone?
Hi guys, got this problem with creating such a thing... hope anyone could help.. the problem: ok, now i have this mock object that would simulate a external rpc call. eg require ''models/xmlrpc_agent'' class XmlrpcAgent def create(params) 200 end end but the value of the value returned is fixed. which is quite hard for me to test the controller when different
2013 Nov 06
0
Merging blzr as blazer (and un-merging voltronic?)
On Nov 1, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > But if blzr supersedes both voltronic and blazer, I propose we rename blazer_{ser,usb} to blazer_{ser,usb}_old, then rename blzr* to blazer*, and revert the voltronic merge. Dan, The pull request against master looks good - thanks! What do you think about the renaming of blazer to blazer_old, and making blzr the new blazer driver? I still have some cleanup to do on the HCL because the filtering code ass...
2014 Jul 23
1
Fw: rsync permission error
Hi All I found that the rsync cannot fully sync permission although I have specified the -A option. The ACL is ok but the permission itself is not. rsync command: rsync -rtgoDAh --stats --files-from=flist.txt --log-file=$DetailLogPath $OldPath $NewPath & Old Server (rsync version 3.0.4): -rw-r-----+ 1 43810537 imopfs 246784 Jul 22 10:17 miki2.sas7bdat New Server (rsync version
2015 Jan 29
6
Indexing Mail faster
...ges in it, and searching the full view only takes 2.5 seconds: > > hmmm, could you please tell me more about your setup? What storage format do you use? Maildir or? What is the cumulative size of your messages? My results without FTS on ZFS FS with SSD L2ARC are not so good: a4 select INBOX._OLD-OUTLOOK * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Junk $NotJunk JunkRecorded $Forwarded) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Junk $NotJunk JunkRecorded $Forwarded \*)] Flags permitted. ** 7748 EXISTS* * 0 RECENT * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1421198037] UIDs valid * OK [UID...
2015 Jan 29
0
Indexing Mail faster
...only takes 2.5 seconds: > > > > > hmmm, could you please tell me more about your setup? What storage format > do you use? Maildir or? What is the cumulative size of your messages? > > My results without FTS on ZFS FS with SSD L2ARC are not so good: > > a4 select INBOX._OLD-OUTLOOK > * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Junk $NotJunk > JunkRecorded $Forwarded) > * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Junk > $NotJunk JunkRecorded $Forwarded \*)] Flags permitted. > ** 7748 EXISTS* > * 0 RECENT > * OK [UIDVALIDI...
2018 Feb 16
0
[RFC PATCH v3 2/3] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...+ + return txq; +} + +/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but + * that some drivers can provide 32bit values only. + */ +static void +virtnet_bypass_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) +{ + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { + u64 nv = new[i]; + u64 ov = old[i]; + s64 delta = nv - ov; + + /* detects if this particular field is 32bit only */ +...
2018 Apr 05
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...n txq; +} + +/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but + * that some drivers can provide 32bit values only. + */ +static void virtnet_bypass_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) +{ + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { + u64 nv = new[i]; + u64 ov = old[i]; + s64 delta = nv - ov; + + /* detects if this particular field is 32bit only */ +...
2018 Apr 20
2
[PATCH v7 net-next 2/4] net: Introduce generic failover module
...; +/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but > + * that some drivers can provide 32finfot values only. > + */ > +static void failover_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, > + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, > + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) > +{ > + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; > + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; > + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { > + u64 nv = new[i]; > + u64 ov = old[i]; > + s64 delta = nv - ov; > + >...
2018 Apr 20
2
[PATCH v7 net-next 2/4] net: Introduce generic failover module
...; +/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but > + * that some drivers can provide 32finfot values only. > + */ > +static void failover_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, > + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, > + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) > +{ > + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; > + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; > + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { > + u64 nv = new[i]; > + u64 ov = old[i]; > + s64 delta = nv - ov; > + >...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: Introduce generic bypass module
...t;+/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but >+ * that some drivers can provide 32bit values only. >+ */ >+static void bypass_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, >+ const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, >+ const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) >+{ >+ const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; >+ const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; >+ u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; >+ int i; >+ >+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { >+ u64 nv = new[i]; >+ u64 ov = old[i]; >+ s64 delta = nv - ov; >+ >+ /* detec...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: Introduce generic bypass module
...t;+/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but >+ * that some drivers can provide 32bit values only. >+ */ >+static void bypass_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, >+ const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, >+ const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) >+{ >+ const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; >+ const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; >+ u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; >+ int i; >+ >+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { >+ u64 nv = new[i]; >+ u64 ov = old[i]; >+ s64 delta = nv - ov; >+ >+ /* detec...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: Introduce generic bypass module
...pass_select_queue); + +/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but + * that some drivers can provide 32bit values only. + */ +static void bypass_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) +{ + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { + u64 nv = new[i]; + u64 ov = old[i]; + s64 delta = nv - ov; + + /* detects if this particular field is 32bit only */ +...
2009 Jul 06
3
How to make big MySQL database more diffable/rsyncable? (aka rsyncing big files)
Hello group, I'm having a very hard time rsyncing efficiently a MySQL database which contains very large binary blobs. (Actually, it's the database of Mantis bug tracker [http://www.mantisbt.org/], with file attachments stored directly in the table rows. I know it's a bad idea from many other reasons, but let's say it was given to me as such.) First, I was dumping the
2018 Apr 20
0
[PATCH v7 net-next 2/4] net: Introduce generic failover module
...; + } + + return txq; +} + +/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but + * that some drivers can provide 32finfot values only. + */ +static void failover_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) +{ + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { + u64 nv = new[i]; + u64 ov = old[i]; + s64 delta = nv - ov; + + /* detects if this particular field is 32bit only */ +...
2018 May 22
0
[PATCH net-next v11 3/5] net: Introduce net_failover driver
...return txq; +} + +/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but + * that some drivers can provide 32bit values only. + */ +static void net_failover_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) +{ + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { + u64 nv = new[i]; + u64 ov = old[i]; + s64 delta = nv - ov; + + /* detects if this particular field is 32bit only */ +...
2018 Apr 20
0
[PATCH v7 net-next 2/4] net: Introduce generic failover module
...suming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but >> + * that some drivers can provide 32finfot values only. >> + */ >> +static void failover_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, >> + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, >> + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) >> +{ >> + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; >> + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; >> + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { >> + u64 nv = new[i]; >> + u64 ov = old[i]; >...
2018 Apr 11
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: Introduce generic bypass module
...g all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but >> + * that some drivers can provide 32bit values only. >> + */ >> +static void bypass_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, >> + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, >> + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) >> +{ >> + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; >> + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; >> + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { >> + u64 nv = new[i]; >> + u64 ov = old[i]; >...
2018 May 07
0
[PATCH net-next v10 2/4] net: Introduce generic failover module
...return txq; +} + +/* fold stats, assuming all rtnl_link_stats64 fields are u64, but + * that some drivers can provide 32bit values only. + */ +static void net_failover_fold_stats(struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_res, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_new, + const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *_old) +{ + const u64 *new = (const u64 *)_new; + const u64 *old = (const u64 *)_old; + u64 *res = (u64 *)_res; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(*_res) / sizeof(u64); i++) { + u64 nv = new[i]; + u64 ov = old[i]; + s64 delta = nv - ov; + + /* detects if this particular field is 32bit only */ +...
2018 Apr 10
6
[RFC PATCH net-next v6 0/4] Enable virtio_net to act as a backup for a passthru device
The main motivation for this patch is to enable cloud service providers to provide an accelerated datapath to virtio-net enabled VMs in a transparent manner with no/minimal guest userspace changes. This also enables hypervisor controlled live migration to be supported with VMs that have direct attached SR-IOV VF devices. Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP that can be used