Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_official_release_".
2015 Sep 16
3
gnu-efi submodule WAS: efi: Makefile improvement
> >>>
> > How about
> > 1) Laying every needed versions of gnu-efi under its own directory where
> > its name could be just the version.
> > 2) Defining the gnu-efi version to use in a Makefile variable; if the source
> > is not present then the Makefile triggers the corresponding
> > "check out" with git.
>
> > The
2015 Sep 16
0
gnu-efi submodule WAS: efi: Makefile improvement
Hi,
On 16/09/2015 21:51, Ady via Syslinux wrote:
> Considering that The Syslinux Project recommends, generally speaking,
> using official binaries
Not withstanding this recommendation, shouldn't a source tarball associated
to an _official_release_ (to clarify: 6.04 when it will be ready, not
7.04-pre<n>) contain all that is needed for a regular user to rebuild all
binaries (included the PE/COFF images) using a "standard" toolchain
(with possibly some clearly stated requirements about that toolchain and/or
any other component...