search for: _no_

Hi, i have sporadic connection problems with my rsync server. I have _no_ firewall involved and there is _no_ max connections set. rsync on the clients is started from cron via a bash script. There's also no permission problem. rsyncd runs as daemon (is not started from inetd). It sometimes works, but every third or fourth rsync fails with this message: rsync: f...

...iFi > isn't very reliable. > > perhaps using the 'soft' mount option will help, along with intr ? Making use of the "intr" option would require that the umount process have the console as its controlling tty. AFAICT, having been invoked from the init process, it has _no_ controlling tty. Hard to send a SIGINT that way. Really, I don't think the problem is specific to WiFi. I believe I'd run into the same thing for any network connection that was not marked "Available to all users" in NetworkManager. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is re...

I just took my HABTM and turned it into a :through since my join table has another "non-joiny" attribute. I went from this: has_many_and_belongs_to :jobs, :join_table => ''tablename'', :foreign_key => ''x'', :association_foreign_key => ''y'' to this: has_many :jobs, :through =>

...> The standard is there. If a distro chooses not to follow it, > you can be very sure it will have acceptance problems. Not nit-pick, but your statement was _exactly_: "Also, run-levels are standarized, and should be the same on all unix-like platforms." Not only is there _no_ standard for System-V platforms, but pretty much LSB says even Linux distros can do what they want. There is _no_ "run-level standard" for "unix-like platforms." > When I have time later today (or tomorrow), I'll give out the > standard I'm mentoning and will giv...

Nick, What are you planning on running over the shared connection? Database, eMail, File Shares? How many users? How much data? What is your I/O profile? I've worked with 'enterprise' storage most of my career either as a consumer, adviser or provider - can't comment on AoE other than to suggest you look at what are the business & technical goals, how they solve it and what

On Sat, 15 May 2004, CVS User ttroxell wrote: > if [ -f /etc/logcheck/header.txt ] ; then > - $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report > + $CAT /etc/logcheck/header.txt >> $TMPDIR/report \ > + || error "Could not append header to $TMPDIR/report Disk full?" > fi > } > > @@ -152,7 +157,8 @@ > # Add a footer

Hi, I am planning to generate code for a peculiar architecture with _no_ branch instructions (!), but with predicated loads and stores to memory. This means the architecture is not Turing complete, is going to waste a lot of computation, and any input program that can hope to get compiled for this architecture must have loops that can be fully unrolled, and all its func...

...to maildir migration. I have them using the latest and greatest mb2md.pl; the one that support -K, -U|-u. They have seen overwhelming success with this; however, a recent mbox introduced a new scenario and the result was that all messages were replayed in the client UI. The mbox in question had _no_ X-UID tags. To work-a-round the issue the customer performed the following steps. [snip] We found that the fix was to clear /var/indexes/$USER for the account and log in and log back out. After doing this X-UID's were populated for each respective message. [/snip] The customer also noted th...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm running Dovecot v2.1 and enabled the lmtp_rcpt_check_quota option in conf.d/20-lmtp.conf, because I just found it in the sample config. Is this option working somewhere? When I have the option enabled, I get _no_ response in the RCPT TO phase, if the user is under quota. If I go on and enter the DATA keyword eventually, I get "554 5.5.1 No valid recipients", so it looks like, the user is really ignored at all. For an user over quota, I get: 552 5.2.2 <user> Quota exceeded (mailbox for u...

...rg-1 wants to pay for their own Internet connection and have asked me to help. I hope to do this using a Linux box running Samba supporting roving profiles (which they need anyway) and Squid. Whats more Org-3 probably wont want me changing the default gateways on the PC's oh and worse there is _no_ DNS whatsoever! So far I have everything working as follows. When a new user is created her roving profile is copied from a template which already has Firefox setup with the necessary proxy settings. When she logs in if she uses Firefox then she will get the new fast connection but IE will deliver...

...os is not working as supposed during the "net ads join" process which should leave a bunch of Kerberos credentials in the ticket cache. Not in my case, where the join of the ADS realm seems to be successful (Samba server is visible in "Active Directory Users and Computers"), but _NO_ Kerberos credetials are available at all due to an error... YES, I have changed the Administrator password after I "raised" the Win 2003 Server to a Domain Controller! And YES, I already tried RC1 (I compiled the rpms exactly as instructed with the delivered spec file and the affiliated s...

Dear R-helpers, when I have an R code chunk in a sweave file like this: <<>>= x <- 1:10 # this comment disapears x # this one does not! print(x) #mean mean(x) @ The first comment does not appear in the sweaved document, the second one does. How can this be? I have tried print=TRUE and keep.source=TRUE, but neither seem to affect this behavior. thanks, Remko

...have the problem that I can't control the formatting of my R source. Setting options(width), as recommended in this forum, works fine on the R _output_, but seems to have unpredictable effects on the echoing of the source code. If I try setting options(width) directly in R, I note that it has _no_ effect on echoed source code, whereas Sweave does sometimes break source code, but not predictably, and not to the same width as output code. I would be happy with any method of manually or automatically controlling the line width of Sweave source, using R, Sweave or LaTeX options. Making the fon...

...ib_FreeBlockList (block_list); > > > + return -1; > > > + } > > > + > > > + position = offset + length; > > > > This inner loop might be long; you could add this: > > > > if (req_one) > > break; So interestingly _no_ you can't add that here, and the reason does reveal why the REQ_ONE flag is still hard to get right even with the simpler implementation of extents. Because VDDK's QueryAllocatedBlocks API only works for some very large aligned block size (64K IIRC), we round down the requested offset befo...

I'm about to replace my old server. Both servers are on my internal network. The old one ist running debian lenny(32bit) with dovecot 1.0.15 and the new one debian Wheezy with dovecot 2.1.7. I set up the users on both systems identically (same gid uid). My first attempt was tho simply rsync the Maildirs along with the homes. Both deovecot versions are set up with the maildir format, but this

Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> writes: > To the issue: I also don't see what your point is. > R works with these so libraries as intended in all cases as > far as we know, and so I don't understand why anything needs to > be changed. > All these libraries "belong to R" and are tied to a specific > version of R and are not be used

On Oct 7, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Nikhil A. Patil wrote: > Hi, > > I am planning to generate code for a peculiar architecture with > _no_ branch instructions (!), but with predicated loads and stores > to memory. This means the architecture is not Turing complete, is > going to waste a lot of computation, and any input program that can > hope to get compiled for this architecture must have loops that can > be full...

...to be automatically computed * (or if it just spans all the nodes), we can safely avoid dealing with - * node-affinity entirely. Ah, node-affinity is also deemed meaningless - * in case it has empty intersection with the vcpu''s vcpu-affinity, as it - * would mean trying to schedule it on _no_ pcpu! + * node-affinity entirely. + * + * Node-affinity is also deemed meaningless in case it has empty + * intersection with mask, to cover the cases where using the node-affinity + * mask seems legit, but would instead led to trying to schedule the vcpu + * on _no_ pcpu! Typical use cases are for...

...d Hat, applying their experiences with Microsoft. Sorry, this is _exactly_ the "demonization" I'm talking about. You are comparing the world's greatest, "we lack even proprietary standards" company to Red Hat, the absolute #1 pro-GPL commercial company. So there's _no_ sense in my responding further. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org

I've yet to assemble a valid crash-procedure to consistently re-produce the issue. AFAIK, whats causing it is possibly CPU-utilization issues with my chaining of processing/DSP, what do y'all think?! -- My encoder setup: Winamp `[DSP] -> SoundSolution (dynamic sonic enhancement) `[Output] -> SqrSoft Crossfading (only ''REAL'' crossfader) `[SqrSoft DSP