search for: _must_

Chris, it is goodness that the LandingpadInst will be pinned to the beginning of a BasicBlock,... except for the possibility of PHINode instructions that _must_ come even earlier.?. I can't exactly put my finger on what's going to go wrong with this, but it sure smells fishy... my current understanding is that the LandingpadInst will "define" some hard registers which will be used by following code to switch to the corresponding ca...

...sidered live immediately after the call on the unwind path. -Andy On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > Chris, > it is goodness that the LandingpadInst will be pinned to the beginning > of a BasicBlock,... except for the possibility of PHINode instructions that _must_ > come even earlier.?. > > I can't exactly put my finger on what's going to go wrong with this, > but it sure smells fishy... > > > my current understanding is that the LandingpadInst will "define" some hard > registers which will be used by following c...

...the latest version can be found at the mod_R project page: http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/twiki/bin/view/Main/ApacheRproject (mind the wrap) Prerequisites ------------- This release has been tested under Debian Linux with Apache 2.0.54, R 2.1.1, and libapreq 2.0.4. Apache2 _MUST_ be compiled with the prefork MPM to compile mod_R. Also, R must have been compiled with the --enable-R-shlib configure flag. Installation ------------ The following is the preferred way to compile and install mod_R: $ ./configure --with-apache2-apxs=/path/to/apxs --with-R=/pat...

...the latest version can be found at the mod_R project page: http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/twiki/bin/view/Main/ApacheRproject (mind the wrap) Prerequisites ------------- This release has been tested under Debian Linux with Apache 2.0.54, R 2.1.1, and libapreq 2.0.4. Apache2 _MUST_ be compiled with the prefork MPM to compile mod_R. Also, R must have been compiled with the --enable-R-shlib configure flag. Installation ------------ The following is the preferred way to compile and install mod_R: $ ./configure --with-apache2-apxs=/path/to/apxs --with-R=/pat...

...th. > > -Andy > > On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Peter Lawrence wrote: > >> Chris, >> it is goodness that the LandingpadInst will be pinned >> to the beginning >> of a BasicBlock,... except for the possibility of PHINode >> instructions that _must_ >> come even earlier.?. >> >> I can't exactly put my finger on what's going to go wrong with this, >> but it sure smells fishy... >> >> >> my current understanding is that the LandingpadInst will "define" >> some hard >> regi...

...applies _only_ to string literals, absolutely nothing else. Objects are defined like so: Two pointers of the same type compare equal if and only if they are both null, both point to the same object or function, or both point one past the end of the same array. This means they _must_ compare !=, if they are different objects. Wether are the same object or or not is answered by the notion of linkage: 8 An identifier used in more than one translation unit can potentially refer to the same entity in these translation units depending on the linkage (_basic.link_)...

...r claimed there was. Just saying that: obj = READ_ONCE(*foo); val = READ_ONCE(obj->val); Never needs a barrier (except on Alpha and we want to make that go away). Simply because a CPU needs to complete the load of @obj before it can compute the address &obj->val. Thus the second load _must_ come after the first load and we get LOAD-LOAD ordering. Alpha messing that up is a royal pain, and Alpha not being an active/living architecture is just not worth the pain of keeping this in the generic model.

...r claimed there was. Just saying that: obj = READ_ONCE(*foo); val = READ_ONCE(obj->val); Never needs a barrier (except on Alpha and we want to make that go away). Simply because a CPU needs to complete the load of @obj before it can compute the address &obj->val. Thus the second load _must_ come after the first load and we get LOAD-LOAD ordering. Alpha messing that up is a royal pain, and Alpha not being an active/living architecture is just not worth the pain of keeping this in the generic model.

I copied an exact copy of "http://demo.script.aculo.us/ajax/autocompleter" to my harddisc inclusive all .js and .css. Then I changed "new Ajax.Autocompleter(''contact_name'', ''contact_name_auto_complete'', ''/ajax/auto_complete_for_contact_name'', {})" to "new Ajax.Autocompleter(''contact_name'',

...ike Stump wrote: [...] > Objects are defined like so: > > Two pointers of > the same type compare equal if and only if they are both null, > both > point to the same object or function, or both point one past the > end > of the same array. > > This means they _must_ compare !=, if they are different objects. Aha! Thanks for quoting that: It's from an expired standard (1998, presumably). The 2003 standard has changed the words for that, taking away the property under discussion (for a different reason -- see Core Issue 73). [...] > So, let me...

...only valid authority for a certificate is the party using it. Any third party with unknown participants cannot be a "Certificate Authority" in its true sense. This is why you should see "Let's Encrypt" simply as a cheap way to fake security. It is a US entity, which means it _must_ hand out all necessary keys to fake certificates to the US authorities _by law_. Now probably you can imagine why they are giving the certificates out for free. US authorities can compromise all of them - without any "open knowledge". It would be dead easy to prevent this fake for the guy...

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:50 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > For the moment, yes. If unwind gets implemented one day (I have a plan, > but no time right now), the implementation is sure to call routines in > the gcc runtime. As a transient solution that makes sense, but it seems desirable to have a generalized unwind scheme that is not tied to libgcc. shap

...n is sure to call routines >> in >> the gcc runtime. > > As a transient solution that makes sense, but it seems desirable to > have > a generalized unwind scheme that is not tied to libgcc. Ok, but, realize that in order to be platform abi compatible with gcc/g ++, one _must_ do certain things. If you had a totally different scheme that didn't interoperate with gcc/g++, then, you break the platform abi. If one can throw out such compatibility, then, well, it just doesn't matter.

Hi R-users I am having troubles accessing elements after the $ symbol. Reproducible example: >test <- data.frame (first=1:10, second=11:20, third=21:30) >test$first #this works fine but when I try >interest <- "first" >test$interest # does not seem to work Could you tell me why that happens and show how to do instead? Thanks so much Lorenzo

I'm attaching a simple doc patch against current CVS - feel free to re-word it as you see fit. I also noticed that if UseDNS is no, HostbasedUsesNameFromPacketOnly _must_ be yes if you want HostbasedAuthentication to work. -- Carson -------------- next part -------------- --- sshd_config.5.DIST 2003-09-13 02:25:18.365707000 -0400+++ sshd_config.5 2003-09-13 02:46:29.430974000 -0400@@ -245,6 +245,16 @@ and applies to protocol version 2 only. The default is .Dq no...

Hello All, I've decided to go ahead and plug my fax machine into one half of a Sipura SPA-2000. I've Google the list archive for examples of default fax contexts but not come up witha clearly working result. Can someone here please send me a config fragment that theyt know to work? Thanks, Michael -- Michael Graves mgraves@pixelpower.com Sr. Product

In the documentation for graphics::legend(), the entry for "pch" is: > pch: the plotting symbols appearing in the legend, either as vector of 1-character strings, or one (multi character) string. _Must_ be specified for symbol drawing. If I did not misread them, examples in the same documentation page suggest that it is also possible to pass integers. Best, Laurent

...: ... weak: ... appending: ... externally visible: If none of the above identifiers are used, the global is externally visible, meaning that it participates in linkage and can be used to resolve external symbol references. But, there's no way to do this in the code. You _must_ supply the third argument to GlobalVariable's constructor (it doesn't default) and the only values accepted are GlobalValue::LinkageTypes. If I use "ExternalLinkage" is this the same as providing nothing in assembly and getting the default "externally visible"? Reid. -...

...ling oh-323 with the current cvs stable, so I tried the inbiult one (with specifiec recommended versions of openh323 and pwlib). It compiled cleanly but I am told that it is not recommended (unstable?). Can someone with first-hand * H.323 experience offer any meaningful advice as to which way I _must_ proceed? This is for a live, busy, deployed environment. H.323 will be used to connect to an upstream provider (possibly CISCO gear?). Thanks in advance.

...lme(distance ~ age + Sex, data = Orthodont, random = ~ 1) | > | > # Error in array(c(rep(1, p), .C(inner_perc_table, as.double(X), as.integer(unlist(grps)), : | > # object 'inner_perc_table' not found That is a known issue with R 3.4.0 -- see NEWS. Packages using .C and .Fortran _must_ be recompiled for R 3.4.0. If and when you do, the example will work again. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org