search for: _might_

I need to use contr.sum and observe that some levels are not statistically different from the overall mean of zero. What is the proper way of forcing the zero estimate? It seems the column corresponding to that level should become a column of zeros. Is there a way to achieve that without me constructing the design matrix? Thank you. Stephen Bond [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...he > issues we see with HP systems? The load-and-hang many of them do with > syslinux.efi as discussed here? E.g., maybe they implement this > protocol a little better...? > -Alan Apologies for this slight off-topic. Who "they" would be? Let's not fool ourselves. HP _might_ solve possible issues regarding their firmware when a (current) MS OS / bootloader shows some problem for users of newish HP hardware. Let me emphasize: HP will _only_ consider publishing a firmware update under certain specific conditions, and any issue related (even loosely) with using sysli...

...em. Maybe you'll have to get your web server to pass > .ogg as a PHP script? <yuck> > > Geoff. > I think the icecast docs somewhere say that this is the case - that due to bugs in winamp (and some other clients), you'll need your URLs to end with ".ogg". You _might_ (I haven't tested this!) be able to do this with a 'fake' url parameter, like: http://server:port/myscript.php?makewinampwork=file.ogg Mike --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, se...

...g headers or body for some email. But something in dovecot is coredumping when I select certain mailboxes. Thunderbird just hangs when you select that mailbox, and mutt gets an EOF on the imap socket while "fetching message headers". Other mailboxes seem to run OK. The failing ones _might_ be empty or have only 1 message in them. Removing index files doesn't help. There is a core file in /var/run/dovecot, and file(1) says it's from dovecot-auth, but GDB can't make sense of the core with that executable, and the login has well and truly run when the core happens. (Th...

...ed to the default form helpers? Moving from this: <%= form_for(@post) do |f| %> <%= f.text_field :title %> <% end %> to this: <%= form_for(@post) do %> <%= text_field :title %> <% end %> etc. I tried it earlier just to check and kind of expected that it _might_ already have been implemented. I don''t know much about the implementation details, other than that it''s possible to do but requires a bit of magic, but I feel like it might be something worth considering. —P -- Paul Campbell paul@hypertiny.ie - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -...

...merged upstream yet. I hope it will be > soon. I also hope it will be part of the (soon to come) release of > 6.04. But AFAIK, it's up to Gene. Tradition in Syslinux has indeed shown that a single person does a release. Whoever is doing the next release: just do it Don't worry what _might_ go wrong, enjoy what went fine. > However, regarding this bug report for Ubuntu, yes, since it worked > with ubuntu 15.04 but not with ubuntu 15.10, it might be the gcc5 bug. > However, this would require a confirmation, like recompiling it with > the above patches and trying again. &...

...econd server are set up to accept keys and not >passwords >> > > so at least I don't have to worry about that. > >Try changing kernel console log level to 0, possibly: > > echo '0 0 0 0' > /proc/sys/kernel/printk > >should take effect instantly. You _might_ be able to do this >remotely via ssh. Also possibly can do via magic sysrq + 0. > >(see: RHEL 6 Deployment Guide (rev 3.1 2011-05-19) Appendix C >pp.537-538) > >HTH, HAND, >-- >Charles Polisher > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list...

Hello, Is it possible to install extlinux into a disk image, without being root ? It seems like extlinux --install absolutely requires the specific block device in which extlinux should be installed to be mounted. This prevents from doing an extlinux installation as non-root, which is annoying for build systems such as Buildroot [1] that build a complete Linux system from source, without being

My first attempt ro enable the short options for --uefi, --mac, --mbr was faulty. Here is the second try. This change enables the options -u, -m, -b as promised by the help text. --- isohybrid.c.006_opt_mbr_standalone 2014-06-22 20:10:49.000000000 +0200 +++ isohybrid.c.007_short_opts_umb 2014-06-23 19:52:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ check_option(int argc, char *argv[]) char *err =

...atever cross-targets I wanted for a particular > > package. > > Would passing one option, "--enable-arch=host", be ok? If what you mean is that "--enable-arch=host" would build only the host target, that could work. "--enable-arch=host-only" or something _might_ be clearer. So let me see if I can paraphrase: the proposal is to add a new configure option to the build, "--enable-arch" (or "--enable-target" -- either works for me). One can provide comma separated parameters to "--enable-arch" as follows: -- "all":...

...e indicates that I would need an Exchange server to implement roaming profiles+mail. My question is - can it be done without Exchange (ie using PST files)? My understanding is that the size of the PST files prohibits roaming profiles. FWIW, my mail configuration is IMAP based, not POP-based, so it _might_ make the PST files smaller, though I'm not sure. Thanks.

...ouncement mean to the CentOS community? >From what point in the past to what point present/future should the user community be concerned? Once you find the final culprit, how sure will you be whether any issue is/was malicious vs benign? Do you perform regular server checksums to compare what _might_ have changed (i.e. tripwire, etc)? What is the level and mitigation of damage control - current and future? What additional specifics can we learn from you - from safe/tainted media checksum files to ISO media itself? From keeping machines up and running to needing a fresh install? Could the sa...

...the cake because you can't possibly see why someone might want an old NUMA/SBUS platform. You can assume I'm "wrong," or go out-of-your-way to talk about it. But that's _not_ while I'm posting. I'm posting so people are aware that there _are_ applications where you _might_ want such capabilities. Your continued insistence in asserting there is no application whatsoever is what *I* have a "problem" with. It's not about "wrong" -- it's about what people _might_ need. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org

...plies symmetries in use. > Otherwise it's actively misleading. > > In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the > caller wants. > > In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the > future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or > something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_. > > The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information > that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory >...

...uot;Builds" _do_ often take memory and disk into account (especially memory latency, which _can_ actually be worse on P4 DDR2 platforms than some old EDO platforms ;-). I was just trying to "open your mind" to the fact that there _are_ applications where an 8-way, NUMA/SBUS solution _might_ just be usable. Maybe not for you, but for some applications, especially at the price point. That's _all_ I was saying. I noted others were also trying to give statements that were good reasons. You may think they are not solutions worth the power, but not all of us agree with you. That...

...t all on > Legacy OS mode (MBR), while it should... :-/ No, it shouldn't. If you are initially booting in (U)EFI mode (into rEFInd, or some EFI shell or any other EFI boot loader or EFI boot manager), then generally speaking you are expected to boot in EFI mode. But some (U)EFI firmware _might_ be able to "automagically" boot some external media (e.g. USB flash drive) in CSM mode without having to set it in the firmware. To be clear, "recognizing" the USB device in the boot list is not the same as being able to boot from it. In general terms, you need to set your...

Just a small correction: Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > I expect the average waste to be a bit less than 16 MB. > > Yes, but slightly misleading. For example, the "16MB average" is > > relevant for 255/63. > > We advise two geometries: -h 63 -s 32 and -h 255 -s 63. > isohybrid behavior with the first one will not

...want ?cbind to point to the base package help pages, not to mine. Assuming that's not unwise (?), what do I have to do to tell R cmd that it should not look for Rd docs for cbind and cbind.default in my package whilst still having my generic handle dispatch correctly? It looks like one answer _might_ be not to export my redefined cbind - but will a local generic still work properly if it's not exported? Steve Ellison ******************************************************************* This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Al Stone wrote: >> Actually, the options have to be expressed as "enable-something" so >> I've opted for "--enable-target-this" to enable just the $host target. >> if you specify --disable-target-this (the default) then you get >> whatever platforms you specify with --enable-target-{targetname} >> >> Does that make

Hi I have a weird early boot bug that most likely happens because of interaction between syslinux (6.03pre18), btrfs and initram generated by Linux Arch installer. For some reason boot fails. Syslinux prints some information and returns back to the menu. Unfortunately it clears all the messages from screen. I really want to know what boot process prints there. Looking at