Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "_massive_".
2015 Aug 26
3
[3.7 Release] RC4 has been tagged
Dear testers,
3.7.0-rc4 has just been tagged. It is identical to rc3, plus:
- r245902: Revert r245355: change of clang-tools-extra symlink in the
release script
- r245947: Merge of r245927: Fix LLDB build on MIPS
- r245948: Deprecate the DataLayout on the TargetMachine, and backport
the 3.8 API
- Changes to the ReleaseNotes.
Those changes should all be safe, and I expect this to be an extremely
2014 Oct 27
2
[PATCH v12 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add para-virtualization support
On 10/24/2014 06:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:53:27PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The additional register pressure may just cause a few more register moves
>> which should be negligible in the overall performance . The additional
>> icache pressure, however, may have some impact on performance. I was trying
>> to balance the performance of
2014 Oct 27
2
[PATCH v12 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add para-virtualization support
On 10/24/2014 06:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:53:27PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The additional register pressure may just cause a few more register moves
>> which should be negligible in the overall performance . The additional
>> icache pressure, however, may have some impact on performance. I was trying
>> to balance the performance of
2014 Oct 27
0
[PATCH v12 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Add para-virtualization support
...formance they should not be using virt crap :-)
> >
> >I only really care about bare metal.
>
> Yes, I am aware of that. However, the whole point of doing PV spinlock is to
> improve performance in a virtual guest.
Anything that avoids the lock holder preemption nonsense is a _massive_
win for them, a few function calls should not even register on that
scale.
> +#ifdef _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH
> +static void pv_queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
> +#else
> void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
> +#endif
If you have tw...
2005 Jun 25
3
SW-RAID on 2 SATA controllers
Hi,
Would it be advisable to use SW-RAID using 2 different SATA controllers.
My system happens to have both a VIA VT8237 and SIL3114 SATA controller,
and I thought for both performance reason and redundancy using both for a
2 disk RAID1 array would be best.
But it's possible that SW-RAID does not like or cannot overcome problems
with such a setup or that one of these drivers is known to
2013 Jun 29
6
[Bug 66366] New: Laptop with Nvidia GPU is hot while using xserver-xorg-video-nouveau driver
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66366
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 66366
Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: Laptop with Nvidia GPU is hot while using
xserver-xorg-video-nouveau driver
QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS:
2005 Nov 14
1
selinux stuff - I just don't get -- "outgoing firewallsare broken"
> How's forever work for you? ;->
Absolutely FINE thank you!
When your WizWonder package is housebroken,
let me try it if I'm interested.
Until then, a (stubbornly) broken distro will persuade me to
try something else. That's why I left Windows, I guess, if
you prognosticate correctly, it will be why I leave
RedHat/CentOS.
btw this has nothing to do with Firewalls at
2005 Dec 05
5
SMB server with CentOS 4
Hi,
I need to set up a small server for a group of ~10 employees (all using
Windows 2000/XP, used to use a windows 2000/exchange setup). I have a
linux server already running CentOS 4, so I'd like to do all I can with
this. I thought about using Samba for file/print sharing and
OpenXchange (commercial version) to have a nice
collaborative/mail/calendar/etc server. Of course, it would