Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "_m_impl".
Did you mean:
m_impl
2006 Sep 02
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote:
> Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these:
>
> statement functions
> intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc)
> loops, goto statments
> scalarized array operations
> function calls with *no arguments*
> simple common blocks
Great!
> Function calls with more than one argument don't work.
2006 Sep 02
2
[LLVMdev] gfortran calling convention
The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at
all, so I had to work from my own sample codes, and generate test
cases from them.
Here's what works now, and I have a separate test case for each of these:
statement functions
intrinsic functions (print, cos, etc)
loops, goto statments
scalarized array operations
function calls with *no arguments*
simple common
2011 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] Printing error with Value objects
...er> = {_vptr.AbstractTypeUser = 0x92184c0}, ID =
72, Abstract = true, SubclassData = 299242, RefCount = 153191633,
Context = @0x89f3aac, ForwardType = 0x0, AbstractTypeUsers =
{<std::_Vector_base<llvm::AbstractTypeUser*,
std::allocator<llvm::AbstractTypeUser*> >> = {
_M_impl = {<std::allocator<llvm::AbstractTypeUser*>> =
{<__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<llvm::AbstractTypeUser*>> = {<No data
fields>}, <No data fields>},
_M_start = 0x921f726, _M_finish = 0x921a090, _M_end_of_storage =
0x921e898}}, <No data fields>}, NumConta...