Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_m_check_equal_allocators".
2017 Apr 19
2
Default R-3.4.0 RC CXXFLAGS without -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu with g++-5.4.0 causes WARNING from stl_list.h
...evel/2017-April/010733.html
where we have WARNINGS in R CMD check from "Found ?abort?,?
possibly from ?abort? (C)" in packages xcms/mzR.
The abort() call is not coming from XCMS, but rather?
from the C++ code in the STL:
[...]
# 1770 "/usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_list.h"
void _M_check_equal_allocators(list& __x) {
?if (_M_get_Node_allocator())
???__builtin_abort();
}
If we compile with -O2 optimisation, this getting rid of?
the abort() symbol, as shown?
in https://github.com/sneumann/xcms/issues/150#issuecomment-293545521
Martin Morgan created a minimum example that shows that?
the symb...
2017 Apr 20
0
Default R-3.4.0 RC CXXFLAGS without -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu with g++-5.4.0 causes WARNING from stl_list.h
...e have WARNINGS in R CMD check from "Found ?abort?,?
> possibly from ?abort? (C)" in packages xcms/mzR.
> The abort() call is not coming from XCMS, but rather?
> from the C++ code in the STL:
>
> [...]
> # 1770 "/usr/include/c++/5/bits/stl_list.h"
> void _M_check_equal_allocators(list& __x) {
> ?if (_M_get_Node_allocator())
> ???__builtin_abort();
> }
>
> If we compile with -O2 optimisation, this getting rid of?
> the abort() symbol, as shown?
> in https://github.com/sneumann/xcms/issues/150#issuecomment-293545521
>
> Martin Morgan create...