Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_lower_".
Did you mean:
_slower_
2009 Jun 30
1
possible agrep bug; R 2.9.1, Mac OS X 10.5 (PR#13789)
...[8,] 0.37105263 0
[9,] 0.42263158 0
[10,] 0.47421053 0
[11,] 0.52578947 0
[12,] 0.57736842 0
[13,] 0.62894737 1
[14,] 0.68052632 1
[15,] 0.73210526 1
[16,] 0.78368421 1
[17,] 0.83526316 1
[18,] 0.88684211 0 ## NOTE that there is a match reported with a
threshold _lower_ than this!
[19,] 0.93842105 0
[20,] 0.99000000 1
--please do not edit the information below--
Version:
platform = i386-apple-darwin8.11.1
arch = i386
os = darwin8.11.1
system = i386, darwin8.11.1
status =
major = 2
minor = 9.1
year = 2009
month = 06
day = 26
svn rev = 48839
lang...
2008 Oct 16
1
One-sample test for p
Hi, i am doing a statistics course and am having trouble with an exercise
where i need to determine whether my success rate at something is higher
than 80%.
I was successful in 29 out of 60 trials, so these were the commands i
entered into R:
>n=60
>p.hat=29/n
>p.0=0.8
>se.0=sqrt(p.0*(1-p.0)/n)
>z=(p.hat-p.0)/se.0
>print(z)
Which returned:
[1] -6.132224
>1-pnorm(z)
Which