search for: _local_

/etc/login.access does not work 100% over ssh. I have the following line in login.access -:ray:ALL EXCEPT LOCAL Which I believe means the user 'ray' can not login from anywhere unless it is a local login. So, I tested it over ssh from a remote box tigger@piglet:~% ssh ray@sonic.cbnmediaX.com.au Password: Password: Password: ray@sonic.cbnmediaX.com.au's password: Last login: Sat

On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Scott Michel wrote: > Chris: > > On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an > unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) > > I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. > > On the x86_64 buildbot, the same test fails. The culprit is grep, > evidently....

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:30:03 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Windows, the SYSTEM account is used by services on the local host > (in your case, the local host is your Samba server). For example, > virus scanners might use it to get access to all files. However, > there is nothing on your Samba server that uses the SYSTEM account. >

Chris: On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. On the x86_64 buildbot, the same test fails. The culprit is grep, evidently. It's just that simple....

Hi Louis, Am 17.02.2017 um 09:26 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: >> What uses the SYSTEM principal on the Sysvol share? > > Every computer or user the has a GPO set. You may be right that "computer" GPOs are applied locally using the SYSTEM account. However, this is _local_ and the computer does not access the Sysvol share using the SYSTEM account. To download the computer GPOs, the machine account is used to connect to the share. Per-user GPOs are downloaded using the user's permissions and applied to the user's files and registry (HKCU). However, I gav...

On Dec 30, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > 2008/12/30 Scott Michel <scottm at aero.org> > Not entirely sure how to categorize this particular problem, but it's > clearly platform test related: "grep -w" appears to operate > differently on the x86_64 linux buildbot versus my local Mac OS > 10.4.11 and Ubuntu x86_64. In the CellSPU's shift_ops.ll test

* Scott Michel: > On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an > unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) > > I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. > > On the x86_64 buildbot, the same test fails. The culprit is grep, > evidently. It&...

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Scott Michel <scottm at aero.org> wrote: > On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Scott Michel wrote: >> >>> Chris: >>> >>> On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an >>> unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) >>> >>> I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. >>> >>> On the x86_64 buildbot, the same test fails....

On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Scott Michel wrote: > >> Chris: >> >> On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an >> unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) >> >> I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. >> >> On the x86_64 buildbot, the same test fails. The culprit is grep,...

...r and two XLite softphones, where Asterisk and the local XLite phone are located in a LAN behind a NAT router, and the remote XLite phone is located elsewhere on the Net behind its own NAT router: http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/3749/asterisknat.png I'm having the following issue: When the _local_ XLite calls out the remote XLite, everything works fine; However, when the _remote_ XLite calls the local XLite, things work OK until precisely 20s, where Asterisk decides to hang up, and displays the following error message in the console: ================== WARNING[593]: chan_sip.c:1948 retrans_...

...kes at least 10 seconds, sometimes longer. Word takes AGES to load (> 15 seconds before anything happens) and I can't save files to a network driver within Word; I have to "save as" to a local disk and then copy over to the network drive. Strangely enough, even accessing stuff on a _local_ drive is slow with a network connection, although I'm not actually writing to the network drive. Our admin says we have a WINS server running (for what it's worth...). Could some kind soul enlighten me as to what might be the problem? It's no fun trying to work like this :-( Cheers,...

...m 09:26 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > >> What uses the SYSTEM principal on the Sysvol share? > > > > Every computer or user the has a GPO set. > > You may be right that "computer" GPOs are applied locally using the > SYSTEM account. However, this is _local_ and the computer does not > access the Sysvol share using the SYSTEM account. To download the > computer GPOs, the machine account is used to connect to the share. > Per-user GPOs are downloaded using the user's permissions and applied to > the user's files and registry (HKCU)....

On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:58:58 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Am 16.02.2017 um 17:27 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > However, SYSTEM is used in sysvol and Windows expects it. > > Clients, who are accessing the share, do not require it to be set on > the local filesystem the share uses on the server, because SYSTEM is > a local

...isk servers (Version 1.4.11) using PRI cards (tied to telco here in Belgium). Indeed we noticed that whenever a local user places an outgoing call through the PRI (and telco) to another IPBX (tied to telco using BRI or PRI), if the remote party places the call on hold, the caller hears the _local_ music on hold instead of the remote one. In fact we can briefly hear the remote music on hold start, then it is replaced by the local one. More precisely: Company 1 uses an asterisk server with a PRI card tied to the telco. Company 2 uses any PBX that ca place calls on hold and is tied to th...

...te: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Scott Michel <scottm at aero.org> wrote: >> On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Scott Michel wrote: >>> >>>> Chris: >>>> >>>> On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an >>>> unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) >>>> >>>> I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. >>>> >>>> On the x86_64 buildbot, t...

Hi list, I have a (naive?) question about samba local users. My system: CentOS 6.6 w/Samba 3.6, connected to an AD Domain through Winbind. When creating a local user, I always first create a Unix user with passwd and then I use smbpasswd -a <unixuser> to establish the mapping between the tdbsam database and the local /etc/passwd file. I wonder if, using the tdbsam in conjunction with

...ENTER: pam_sm_setcred (flags: 0x0002) pam_winbind(gdm:setcred): PAM_ESTABLISH_CRED not implemented pam_winbind(gdm:setcred): [pamh: 0x88bcf70] LEAVE: pam_sm_setcred returning 0 Some configurations: 1 - Nsswitch configure with LDAP, its work fine. 2 - smb.conf [global] workgroup = _LOCAL_ netbios name = debian-x11 realm = LOCAL.INT.BR security = domain wins server = 10.111.222.100 use kerberos keytab = yes client use spnego = yes client NTLMv2 auth = yes bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = eth0 10.111.222.103, lo 127.0.0.1 hosts...

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 00:28:14 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > > Yes, because > 1.) It might be necessary _locally_ on the Windows DC > because some _local_ services (e. g. Virus scanners, > etc) may access the files _locally_ _on the DC itself_. > However if anything on the client (the OS or a user) > would access the share using the SYSTEM privilege, > then "full control" is surely not the permission >...

I''ve installed a bering box acting as a firewall for a lan; the lan is 192.168.1.0/24 the bering box is 192.168.1.254 I''ve installed a squid server 192.168.1.1 It is possible to configure shorewall for a transparent proxy to the squid server? I''ve tryed with REDIRECT loc loc:192.168.1.1:3128 tcp www - !192.168.1.1 in the rules file I get this error: Error:

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > * Scott Michel: > >> On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an >> unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) >> >> I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. >> >> On the x86_64 buildbot, the same test fails. The culprit is grep,...