search for: _lhs

...n eval(e, x, parent.frame()) : object 'y' not found > 12: eval(e, x, parent.frame()) 11: eval(e, x, parent.frame()) 10: subset.data.frame(., y == 1) 9: subset(., y == 1) 8: function_list[[k]](value) 7: withVisible(function_list[[k]](value)) 6: freduce(value, `_function_list`) 5: `_fseq`(`_lhs`) 4: eval(quote(`_fseq`(`_lhs`)), env, env) 3: eval(quote(`_fseq`(`_lhs`)), env, env) 2: withVisible(eval(quote(`_fseq`(`_lhs`)), env, env)) 1: data.frame(x = 1) %>% subset(y == 1) > subset(data.frame(x = 1), y == 1) traceback() > Error in eval(e, x, parent.frame()) : object 'y...

Thanks for the answers, I?m aware of the ?.? option, just wanted to give a very simple example. But the lapply ??' parameter use has eluded me and thanks for enlightening me. What do you mean by messing up the call stack. As far as I understand it, piping should translate into same code as deep nesting. So then I only see a tiny downside for debugging here. No loss of time/space efficiency