search for: _lguest_defs_h_

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "_lguest_defs_h_".

2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 2/2] Arch-specific includes
...lauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa Red Hat Inc. "Free as in Freedom" -------------- next part -------------- --- /dev/null 2007-04-02 15:35:49.510433377 -0300 +++ i386/lguest_defs.h 2007-04-02 16:19:27.000000000 -0300 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +#ifndef _LGUEST_DEFS_H_ +#define _LGUEST_DEFS_H_ + +/* LGUEST_TOP_ADDRESS comes from the Makefile */ +#define RESERVE_TOP_ADDRESS LGUEST_GUEST_TOP - 1024*1024 + +#endif --- /dev/null 2007-04-02 15:35:49.510433377 -0300 +++ x86_64/lguest_defs.h 2007-04-02 16:19:27.000000000 -0300 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +#ifndef _LGUEST_DEFS_H_ +...
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 2/2] Arch-specific includes
...lauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa Red Hat Inc. "Free as in Freedom" -------------- next part -------------- --- /dev/null 2007-04-02 15:35:49.510433377 -0300 +++ i386/lguest_defs.h 2007-04-02 16:19:27.000000000 -0300 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +#ifndef _LGUEST_DEFS_H_ +#define _LGUEST_DEFS_H_ + +/* LGUEST_TOP_ADDRESS comes from the Makefile */ +#define RESERVE_TOP_ADDRESS LGUEST_GUEST_TOP - 1024*1024 + +#endif --- /dev/null 2007-04-02 15:35:49.510433377 -0300 +++ x86_64/lguest_defs.h 2007-04-02 16:19:27.000000000 -0300 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +#ifndef _LGUEST_DEFS_H_ +...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Unified lguest launcher
This is a new version of the unified lguest launcher that applies to the current tree. According to rusty's suggestion, I'm bothering less to be able to load 32 bit kernels on 64-bit machines: changing the launcher for such case would be the easy part! In the absence of further objections, I'll commit it. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> -- =
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH] Unified lguest launcher
This is a new version of the unified lguest launcher that applies to the current tree. According to rusty's suggestion, I'm bothering less to be able to load 32 bit kernels on 64-bit machines: changing the launcher for such case would be the easy part! In the absence of further objections, I'll commit it. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> -- =