search for: _less_

...Why does Fedora care about FIPS 140? To me, this seems like it should be specific to RHEL and maybe CentOS Stream, not Fedora. My understanding is that Fedora will never be FIPS 140 complaint anyway so there is no point in even trying, not least because the FIPS validated version will generally be _less_ secure than the non-FIPS version. To give just one example, OpenSSH defaults to a post-quantum key exchange that FIPS does not allow. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc...

Hi, This patch add a new macro called btrfs_error(...) which deprecate the use of fprintf(stderr, ...) regards, Eduardo

...his means that I get a warning if using the argument for "what is what meant for" (at least in my opinion). Right now I get many warnings when writing the binary files I am working with, which might be confusing to future users. I would suggest to only give a warning if requesting _less_ characters, since in that case R would truncate the argument. Finally, having a NA or a negative number (not shown) in the nchars argument makes R crash, at least on two platforms: > con <- file("test", open = "wb") > writeChar(as.character(c("ab", &qu...

...marking itself dirty as it would for ext2. It needs a full e2fsck after an unclean shutdown in either case, though a clean shutdown would be totally safe, and no further action would be needed if the journal device returned at some later time. The journal device shouldn't make the filesystem _less_ reliable. Cheers, Andreas >> I can't run fsck because the journal is not >> reachable. Is there any way to solve this? I understand I lost any >> pending changes in the journal. > > Can you use debugfs to change the state of the fs so that it allows > you to do thi...

So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. What other services need to be delayed? Apache? Bind? Of course if this is a nameserver, Chronyd will probably not be able to resolve the NTP server addresses until Bind is running! thanks

...nymous-namespace", and getting exactly > what they want. (That sort of alternate proposal is way more useful than the straw-man stuff you started out with. Just sayin'.) (Also incidentally, I see gcc 4.8.2 is emitting an explicit import of anonymous namespaces, so that's becoming _less_ different over time.) In fact this is more or less how DwarfDebug operates now; there is a pile (small pile, but still a pile) of individual feature flags that get set various ways depending on target or command-line options. The problem I'm looking at is that the defaults for a lot of these...

...y as it would for > ext2. It needs a full e2fsck after an unclean shutdown in either > case, though a clean shutdown would be totally safe, and no further > action would be needed if the journal device returned at some later > time. The journal device shouldn't make the filesystem _less_ > reliable. Oh funny thing: after powering up the system again, the system said that the filesystem said it was clean while there were changes pending in the journal! After applying those changes, one filesystem was hosed, the other was fine. Hooray for backups. www.vanheusden.com

...l 20, 2017 5:00 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set? > > So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the > system time from 0 to current. Something you might consider to make the time delta _less_ drastic, is to create a service which on system shutdown touches a file {in /etc/} and on boot early in the start-up {make some other services depend on it} checks to see if the system date&time is before the time on that file, if it is then use the time stamp {+ a few sec} on the file to set t...

...uot;ForwardX11Trusted" is "no", the local ssh client will attempt to requested the new generated cookie with xauth, but times out in the attempt, and falls back to forwarding the trusted cookie. (I think this is a bug: it should emit a failure, since it should never default to a _less_ secure option.) The cause of the failure (for our situations) happens one a double-ssh. For example, we have people ssh'ing into our shell machine from home, and then ssh'ing to their project machines, where they run X11 programs. The code just before the xauth calls (in ssh.c:x11_get_...

I'm aware that there are IEEE requirements for floating point. But all C/C++ compilers like GCC or MSVC have unsafe/fast math switches that disable all problems related to NaN/Inf/+-0/precision etc because in some applications those are not as important as performance (for example graphics calculation). But as I understand, LLVM currently does not have such unsafe/fast math optimizations

My application accepts a form to create multiple large(100''s of MB) temporary files and then zip''s them up to send off to a user. I have the files constructed, and the zipping working. The problem is that if I use send_file to send the zip off to the user, I cannot delete the file afterwards as it seems send_file forks off another process and deletes the file before the

One more time: root preexec does: run a command or script if the user hit the share. Now with msdfs proxy it need to be run on the linked host that carries the share. So you are better to set root preexec on the share of the linked host. I think there is no other way. Server1 [sharepointtoserver2] msdfs root=yes msdfs proxy =\server2\shareonserver2 Server2 [shareonserver2] Root

...during driver startup. My solution is to try to get descriptor again without delay in the same get_data call. You may think this way is not good because it will increase number of errors because of the additional load. No, this is not true. This is incredible, but my tests show that there will be _less_ errors with this solution. And furthermore UPS feels best when it is asked permanently without any delay. Now, about the tests. I've made 3 versions of the driver: (1) without retries, (2) with unlimited number of retries (until success) and (3) the one, which didn't stop asking UPS withou...

Hi Bob, > For example expressions like "1+x+1+x+1+x+1+x" (basically adding a lot of > constants and variables) are complied to a long series off<add>s both in IR > and > assembly code. > Both GCC and MSVC generates C1*x +C2 (mov + mul + add). > > I am new to using LLVM. I am using Visual Studio 2008 on Windows, targeting > 32-bit X86 code. I'm using

On 6/25/13 3:13 AM, Folkert van Heusden wrote: > Hi, > > I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other > device (an SSD). > Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o. > I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because > needs_check is set. What does it actually say? there is no needs_check flag AFAIK. > I

Hi, I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other device (an SSD). Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o. I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because needs_check is set. I can't run fsck because the journal is not reachable. Is there any way to solve this? I understand I lost any pending changes in the journal. regards

...nd still do understand the paths you had explained. I, however, had also already explained on 18 May 2015 15:31:55 CEST why your first solution was _not_ a viable option for us (server2 == NETAPP under warranty). I had also already explained on 21 May 2015 22:41:17 CEST why option 2.) was an even _less_ viable solution due to the security permissions of the underlying NTFS system on server 2 then _not_ being user specific and therefore dangerous. I can understand and would accept that the 'msdfs proxy' mechanism might be executing at a time well ahead of the connect block in the code and...

Folks, We are in the process of purchasing new san/s that our mail server runs on (JES3). We have moved our mailstores to zfs and continue to have checksum errors -- they are corrected but this improves on the ufs inode errors that require system shutdown and fsck. So, I am recommending that we buy small jbods, do raidz2 and let zfs handle the raiding of these boxes. As we need more

On May 22, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I fear starting another centi-thread on this but I'll give it a shot. > > We're currently supporting two build systems which is definitely one > more than we (or I) want to support. > > I don't know of any support in autoconf past the > --host/--build/--target

Hi all, I'm attempting to delete some directories and I want to be able to exclude a directory called 'logs' from being deleted. This is my basic find operation (without the exclusion) # find . -type d |tail -10 ./d20160124-1120-df8mfb/deployments ./d20160124-1120-df8mfb/releases ./d20160131-16993-vazqg5 ./d20160131-16993-vazqg5/metadata ./d20160131-16993-vazqg5/deployments