search for: _legal_

Hello, I would like to propose to add a "Contact us" link to centos.org web site. The page footer currently looks like this: "? 2014 The CentOS Project | _Legal_" Unfortunately, even the Legal link does not contain any useful address. It took me a while to dig centos-docs at centos.org and it would be much more convenient to encourage users to report problems with the site without forcing them to dig deep for contacts. I hope this could help to make...

Hello everyone can anyonone of you send me the file codec_g729.so this file has to be inserted in /urs/lib/asterisk/modules Thank You

...the total size of the array is `n1xn2 = 8x9 = 72`, while the largest element we will access is at the largest value of `(i, j)`. That is, `i = s0 - 1 = 2`, and `j = s1 - 1 = 5`. The largest index will be `ix(i=2, j=5, n0=8, n1=9, o0=4, o1=6) = 8*2+8*4+5+6=59`. Since `59 < 72`, we are clearly at _legal_ array indices, by C semantics! The definition of the semantics of the language **changed the illegal multidimensional access** (which is illegal since it exceeds the `n1` dimension), into a **legal flattened 1D access** (which is legal since the flattened array indices are inbounds). LLVM has no...

Hi, I haven't seen this mentioned here before. http://www.plusv.org/ "With traditional MP3, a typical Near CD Quality audio file has been encoded with a data rate of 128 kbits/s. While this is ok for people with big hard disks and fast Internet connections, this data speed has clearly been a bottleneck for people using modems or storing their music into 32 or 64 MB portable player

...= 72`, while the largest >> element we will access is at the largest value of `(i, j)`. That is, >> `i = s0 - 1 = 2`, and `j = s1 - 1 = 5`. >> >> The largest index will be `ix(i=2, j=5, n0=8, n1=9, o0=4, o1=6) = 8*2+8*4+5+6=59`. >> Since `59 < 72`, we are clearly at _legal_ array indices, by C semantics! >> >> The definition of the semantics of the language **changed the illegal >> multidimensional access** (which is illegal since it exceeds the `n1` >> dimension), into a **legal flattened 1D access** (which is legal since the >> flattene...

...8x9 = 72`, while the largest > element we will access is at the largest value of `(i, j)`. That is, > `i = s0 - 1 = 2`, and `j = s1 - 1 = 5`. > > The largest index will be `ix(i=2, j=5, n0=8, n1=9, o0=4, o1=6) = 8*2+8*4+5+6=59`. > Since `59 < 72`, we are clearly at _legal_ array indices, by C semantics! > > The definition of the semantics of the language **changed the illegal > multidimensional access** (which is illegal since it exceeds the `n1` > dimension), into a **legal flattened 1D access** (which is legal since the > flattened ar...

...gest >>> element we will access is at the largest value of `(i, j)`. That is, >>> `i = s0 - 1 = 2`, and `j = s1 - 1 = 5`. >>> >>> The largest index will be `ix(i=2, j=5, n0=8, n1=9, o0=4, o1=6) = 8*2+8*4+5+6=59`. >>> Since `59 < 72`, we are clearly at _legal_ array indices, by C semantics! >>> >>> The definition of the semantics of the language **changed the illegal >>> multidimensional access** (which is illegal since it exceeds the `n1` >>> dimension), into a **legal flattened 1D access** (which is legal since the &...

...ement we will access is at the largest value of `(i, j)`. That is, > > > `i = s0 - 1 = 2`, and `j = s1 - 1 = 5`. > > > > > > The largest index will be `ix(i=2, j=5, n0=8, n1=9, o0=4, o1=6) = 8*2+8*4+5+6=59`. > > > Since `59 < 72`, we are clearly at _legal_ array indices, by C semantics! > > > > > > The definition of the semantics of the language **changed the illegal > > > multidimensional access** (which is illegal since it exceeds the `n1` > > > dimension), into a **legal flattened 1D access** (which...