Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "_interaction_".
Did you mean:
x_interaction_2
2013 Jun 08
1
memdisk and iso
...625 show a success on libcom32.c32 while
>>359,413,414 show an unsuccessful attempt.
>>
>>Something is certainly tripping up as I don't see these duplicate
>>attempts in my testing and in my mind iPXE is in the lead.
>>
>>--
>>-Gene
Correction: an iPXE _interaction_ as it could be that we need to
instruct iPXE's PXE to be quiet while lwIP is using the UNDI and/or
unload. Silencing iPXE's PXE would be preferable in case we chainload
to another NBP (in which case we'd unquiet it).
--
-Gene
2013 Jun 08
2
memdisk and iso
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 5:01 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote:
> Very odd!
>
> This shows a TFTP connection being correctly established and then
> disconnected, with all the negotiation involved. I'm wondering if it is
> iPXE that is playing games with us here...
Packets 301-306, 309-312 show two successful attempts to read
linux-install/pxelinux.cfg/C0A80058