search for: _instead_

I'm starting this thread to discuss what git repository should be designated as primary and which repositories should be designated as secondary. For years, git.kernel.org has been the primary repo, updated at least with every full and pre- release. git.zytor.com has been the secondary and development repo. Additionally, I've maintained my repos at github.com and git.zytor.com as

...its meaning/intention). Therefore, for consistency: _ A command such as: syslinux.exe -i a: bootsecfile.bss should had meant performing both actions: writing to the VBR of a: (and copying the ldlinux.{sys,c32} files to the root of a:) _and_ writing (creating) the bss file; _not_ one action _instead_ of the other. _ A command such as: syslinux.exe a: bootsecfile.bss should had meant writing (creating) the bss file, and copying ldlinux.{sys,c32} to the root of a:, but without writing to the VBR of a:. An additional matter, also regarding consistency, is that for the exe and com installe...

...ing multiple channels for the > same objective (bugs, wiki, tracking patches, optionally "linking" > between them...) is probably not such a good idea. > > 4_ The current bugzilla for Syslinux is not very well maintained. > Should a different method / site be considered _instead_ of it? Should > an _additional_ method / site be considered as optional alternative? > > 5_ github.com is popular. Would having a github repo attract additional > valuable developers (with the adequate skills)? Or would it result in > more maintenance than it would be worth? Pop...

...ign ( (paste ( x, "_sums", sep = "" )[i], sum ( !is.na ( get ( paste ( x, "_thresholds", sep = "" ) )[ ,i] ) ) ) } The problem The above piece of code gives me 10 new vectors but with only 1 value (e.g. the last derived from the loop) _instead_ of 10. Questions 1. How can I construct this properly 2. Related question: how can I print the structure of each column of each "classification" with a for loop? e.g. # a single loop work perfectly as follows: for (i in 1:10) str(burned_eig_normalised_cov.omission_thresholds[,i]) in...

...ct channel. Moreover, having multiple channels for the same objective (bugs, wiki, tracking patches, optionally "linking" between them...) is probably not such a good idea. 4_ The current bugzilla for Syslinux is not very well maintained. Should a different method / site be considered _instead_ of it? Should an _additional_ method / site be considered as optional alternative? 5_ github.com is popular. Would having a github repo attract additional valuable developers (with the adequate skills)? Or would it result in more maintenance than it would be worth? 6_ I would tend to think tha...

...e, for consistency: > > _ A command such as: > > syslinux.exe -i a: bootsecfile.bss > > should had meant performing both actions: writing to the VBR of a: (and > copying the ldlinux.{sys,c32} files to the root of a:) _and_ writing > (creating) the bss file; _not_ one action _instead_ of the other. Unintended changes of past behavior could have negative impacts and should have been the case when the -i/-U flags were started. > _ A command such as: > > syslinux.exe a: bootsecfile.bss > > should had meant writing (creating) the bss file, and copying > ldlinux....

...obably not such a good idea. The github.com issues should only be considered as a replacement to the existing bugzilla, not as an additional means of tracking issues. >> 4_ The current bugzilla for Syslinux is not very well maintained. >> Should a different method / site be considered _instead_ of it? Should >> an _additional_ method / site be considered as optional alternative? Qualify "not very well maintained". Is it just the overall attention towards issues that varies by everyone's availability? If so, I think you might mean to use other words. >> 5_ git...

..._ A command such as: > > > > syslinux.exe -i a: bootsecfile.bss > > > > should had meant performing both actions: writing to the VBR of a: (and > > copying the ldlinux.{sys,c32} files to the root of a:) _and_ writing > > (creating) the bss file; _not_ one action _instead_ of the other. > > Unintended changes of past behavior could have negative impacts and > should have been the case when the -i/-U flags were started. > > > _ A command such as: > > > > syslinux.exe a: bootsecfile.bss > > > > should had meant writing (crea...

...ed on the screen would suggest that you can successfully boot with Syslinux, but from the information you posted we don't really know whether you are booting in CSM or in UEFI mode. For a test, you might want to slightly change the boot message (or use several SAY directives in syslinux.cfg _instead_ of the DISPLAY boot message), as it would be an easy way to identify the boot mode. > > My Quirky is 32-bit, so syslinux is handing over to the 32-bit kernel > ok, I think. But you are using Syslinux UEFI x86_64. Is the hardware UEFI x86_64 or IA32? Some architecture / firmware / b...

...> > > > syslinux.exe -i a: bootsecfile.bss > > > > > > should had meant performing both actions: writing to the VBR of a: (and > > > copying the ldlinux.{sys,c32} files to the root of a:) _and_ writing > > > (creating) the bss file; _not_ one action _instead_ of the other. > > > > Unintended changes of past behavior could have negative impacts and > > should have been the case when the -i/-U flags were started. > > > > > _ A command such as: > > > > > > syslinux.exe a: bootsecfile.bss > > > &g...

I have used syslinux 4.0x and earlier for many years, with Puppy Linux and more recently Quirky Linux. Though, my knowledge of all the capabilities of syslinux remains rudimentary. I am new to UEFI. I recently got my hands on a win8.1 laptop, 64-bit system, and decided to tackle booting Quirky on it, from a USB stick. I turned off Secure Boot. I wrote /usr/share/syslinux/gptmbr.bin to the flash

Not normally a question for this group, but you guys are very bridge/router/firewall savvy, so I thought I''d toss it here. I have a bridge. On one side of the bridge is that fancy thing called the Internet. On the other side is my LAN. The bridge is the obvious demarcation line and a good place to put a firewall. Now, I have all my iptables stuff planned out, EXCEPT for nat. The

...would suggest that > you can successfully boot with Syslinux, but from the information you > posted we don't really know whether you are booting in CSM or in UEFI > mode. For a test, you might want to slightly change the boot message > (or use several SAY directives in syslinux.cfg _instead_ of the > DISPLAY boot message), as it would be an easy way to identify the > boot mode. > >> >> My Quirky is 32-bit, so syslinux is handing over to the 32-bit kernel >> ok, I think. > > But you are using Syslinux UEFI x86_64. Is the hardware UEFI x86_64 > or IA32...

Good afternoon all! I have a project I'm working on that requires Linux to be installed either to its own partition, or to the partition of a host OS (Windows or Linux). One way works, the other way does not... Use Case 1: In this scenario, Linux is installed to its *own* partition as is syslinux (syslinux -i /path/to/syslinux/files). Afterwards, I 'dd' the first 512bytes of that

Hi nut-upsdev, I have just got OMRON BX35F. Only object files and usage information is included. Where should I start to help you to get it supported? Any interest in supporting it at all?

...s taken by PeerFS and Constant Replicator and to use that as a springboard to describe rsyncfs. Both embed themselves into the Linux kernel (as modules), and I assume into/under the VFS, but I am not sure. PeerFS is a peer-to-peer filesystem. It uses its own on-disk filesystem, so one uses PeerFS _instead_ of another filesystem like ext3 or reiser. Constant Replicator sits between the kernel and a normal filesystem, so one uses Constant Replicator on top of a "normal" Linux filesystem like ext3. Here are some simple block diagrams to illustrate how I think each is architected: Host...