search for: _incompatible_

...thing is "Red Hat(R) Linux" because the "Red Hat(R)" trademark is on it. They assume it is completely different if the trademark is not. It doesn't matter if completely modified packages for an architecture Red Hat never supported, and the packages are even completely SRPM _incompatible_, people believed it was still "Red Hat(R) Linux." Ironically, people assume "Fedora(TM) Core" has nothing to do with "Red Hat(R) Enterprise Linux" -- or is at least completely different in its relationship with RHEL than "Red Hat(R) Linux" was -- merely beca...

From: Lee W <centos-list at unassemble.co.uk> > Shouldn't be a problem as it's probably going in a 1U Rack case > with a Riser/extender card. Be sure to hit the 3Ware site to read about _incompatible_ risers! At 66+MHz PCI/PCI-X signaling, many cards/risers have issues. Many are only designed for 33MHz. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org

Christian Buchner wrote: > Now here is where I have problems and not yet found a solution: I know very little about this, so take everything that follows with a large pinch of salt. > * the function names exported in the .lib created by gcc are not compatible > with the function name decorations that the VisualC++ embedded linker expects. Which version of gcc are you using? I know

From: Maciej ?enczykowski <maze at cela.pl> > That's a good point - does anyone know what the new Intel > Virtualization thingamajig in the new dual core pentium D's is about? It's all speculation at this point. But there are _several_ factors. But I'm sure the first time Intel saw AMD's x86-64/PAE52 presentation, the same thing popped into my mind that popped