search for: _improves_

...n argument which the kernel as a wider entity typically accepts? If not could it be a slippery slope to start a precedent? It is a honest question - I am not familiar if there were or were not any similar discussions in the past. My gut feeling is that *if* there is a consensus that something _improves_ the code base significantly, backporting pains should probably not be weighted very heavily as a contra argument. Regards, Tvrtko

...n argument which the kernel as a wider entity typically accepts? If not could it be a slippery slope to start a precedent? It is a honest question - I am not familiar if there were or were not any similar discussions in the past. My gut feeling is that *if* there is a consensus that something _improves_ the code base significantly, backporting pains should probably not be weighted very heavily as a contra argument. Regards, Tvrtko

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > hello Sean, > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 9:04?AM Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > hello Sean, > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: > > I'd really prefer this patch (series or single) is not accepted. This > > will cause problems for everyone cherry-picking patches to a > > downstream kernel (LTS or distro tree). I